User talk:Kearney311

 Hello Kearney311, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  
 * We hope you enjoy the collaborative nature of our encyclopedia and want to stay.
 * As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
 * We value all of our editors higly and believe that Editors Matter!
 * You can ask questions at the New Contributor's Help Page or even at the Village Pump.
 * Alternatively, you can feel free to ask any questions on my talk page; I'm always happy to help.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

 A Few Personal Recommendations:


 * Take comments in the best possible light.
 * Maintain an unbiased, neutral writing style.


 * Note our use (or non-use) of precedent.
 * All that said, be bold in editing Wikipedia!

 About Wikipedia and Contributing:


 * Wikipedia's 5 Pillars — Wikipedia's foundation
 * The Simplified Ruleset — Wikipedia's "rules" summary
 * Contributing to Wikipedia — How you can help guide
 * Questions — Where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet — Wikipedia mark-up coding guide
 * Referencing — How to use the citation tags
 * Table of Contents — Searching and Browsing
 * Department Directory — Wikipedia by Department


 * Introduction
 * Our notability guidelines
 * The need for reliable sources
 * Verifiability is the key to WikiSuccess
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style
 * Vandalism and Civility

 Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (username and date stamp).


 * If you would like to practice your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is the place for you to do it.
 * Be civil, but have fun. That's what it's all about.

 If you'd like any recommendations for a few random articles to take a look at just for fun, go ahead and check out this eclectic list: Capybara — Lantana — Medic — Laurel McGoff — Moolack Beach — Oozlefinch — Oozlefinch — Polar fleece — Pom-pon — Ariana Richards 
 * Good luck, and have fun. We're glad to have you here! '
 * Good luck, and have fun. We're glad to have you here! '

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Kearney has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- BlastOButter42 See  Hear  Speak  08:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  08:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  —  Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  08:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Eamonn Kearney
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Eamonn Kearney, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Eamonn Kearney is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Eamonn Kearney, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Roleplayer (talk) 02:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of James J. Kearney
A tag has been placed on James J. Kearney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ged UK (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)