User talk:KearyClose

February 2010
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, DouglasvilleDA, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username indicates it will be used by many users to either spam or promote, which is a violation of the username policy.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 16:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of City of Douglasville Development Authority
A tag has been placed on City of Douglasville Development Authority requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 16:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 'It seems to me that this was just copy and pasted. Please don't remove the deletion request yourself.' —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 16:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Sigh...
Maybe you don't understand English, or maybe you don't care... I don't honestly know. But, again, STOP REMOVING the Speedy Deletion tag YOURSELF. Please? Thanks. —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 17:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Douglasville logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Douglasville logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 17:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on City of Douglasville Development Authority. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —Duncan What I Do / What I Say 17:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

This account, , has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

'''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).'''

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
 * Add  You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

City of Douglasville Development Authority
I wanted to be sure you understood that, although there appeared to be some difficulty with the copyright surrounding the above-captioned material, that was not the primary reason why it was deleted. Essentially, it appeared to me to qualify as both advertising for the company in question and as a non-notable company; there were no reliable sources demonstrating that any arm's-length third-party experts felt that the company was in any way significant beyond its peers. Best of luck in sorting out your username difficulties and with your future contributions; I'd advise you to read this introductory article before proceeding further. Accounting4Taste: talk 18:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)