User talk:Kedar.Tausalkar

Hello, This is my Talk Page. Please feel free to respond here. Kedar.Tausalkar (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the her or her company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her. Your references seemed to be press releases or quoting her, not independent third-party sources.
 * It's not clear why she is notable. having notable relatives doesn't transfer notability to her, nor does getting married. She seems to own a business, but we are given no indication why that makes her notable either. many people have business, that isn't notable either.
 * you gave some references, but they were not in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of spam include illustrious Political family... natural flair for colour, sketching and designing... As an artist she often found herself expressing her inner feelings through mediums like colours and sketching... penchant for jewellery designing... prestigious jewellery designing certification.. exclusive Jewellery Store... The Store is well established... discerning customer who has an eye for quality precious gems and exclusively designed jewellery...Attention to detail is a plus at this Store as each and every piece displayed and sold here is done so under the expert scrutiny of Neha herself. Gems of the highest quality are personally sorted by Neha as she holds a registered certification in this specialized field... Her interaction on a personal level with the client instills a sense of confidence in the buyer who is assured that he/she is getting value for money.&mdash; it's just fact free promotion for her company and her
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to her website.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for her or her company, or otherwise are acting on her behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by her or her company, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)