User talk:Kedireturns

Cinebee
Hi there, regarding some of your recent edits:

You have introduced cinebee.in across numerous articles, but there are a few problems with this. The images had to be removed because they appeared to be copyright violations, and the overall appearance of the additions strongly resembles spam. For your edification, we do not use blogs as references, as anyone can start a blog and proclaim himself an expert. Your assertion in your edit summary here that you are adding the "Indian IMDb" is problematic for a few reasons: As for your assertion that you are adding a "Cinescore" rating, CinemaScore is a highly-respected audience rating system that has an established reputation for its scientific methodology. They don't simply solicit clicks on the internet. Further, numerous discussions have been held by members of WikiProject Film to discuss the reliability of CinemaScore, and the community has agreed that it is a reliable gauge of audience response. No such discussion has taken place for Cinebee, so there's no presumption that it would be a suitable alternative for Indian films. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Cinebee lacks any sort of reputation for reliability
 * 2) Per WP:RS/IMDb we do not even use IMDb as a reference at Wikipedia because it is user-contributed, and
 * 3) We wouldn't use IMDb user ratings in articles anyway, because we don't care what random people from the internet think. (As an example of why we don't care what random people from the internet think, take a look at MSG-2's 8.0 rating at IMDb and contrast that with the laughably horrid reviews that the film got from critics. The IMDb numbers have obviously been inflated. For more info about this issue, see MOS:FILM.