User talk:Kedrosolan

Hi Kristienne! This is Weiye. Thank you for your message on my Talk page. I'm glad you did it and I look forward to communicating with you throughout the quarter in this honor seminar! Weiyedai (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Kedrosolan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Peer Review Overall I thought this page is very well-written and flows logically. The transitions between subsections makes sense for the most part. The only suggestion I have there is to maybe move the Isozymes section up after structure or function as it relates more to those than clinical significance. The information present is very accurate; however, it is presented in a way that could be confusing for someone like a high-schooler to understand, so maybe simpler language or clarification of more complex ideas could help with that. Otherwise I felt like I gained a decent understanding of this protein through reading the page. The only other suggestion I have is making sure the section on Function is cited. Good luck on finishing this up! Ssbusse (talk) 23:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Mohit's Peer Review for PFK-2
Content: -I think you did a great job adding in those images to the article (nice use of PYMOL). -The reaction mechanism is indeed very helpful in understand what was discussed for the enzyme function. -The PFK-2 pathway also highlights the information in the regulation section very well.

Accuracy: -One thing I'd suggest for writing the name for PFK-2 is adding that hyphen between PFK and 2. This is just to keep it consistent with PFK-1 but not a huge issue.

Organization: -The article seems pretty well organized already. One thing I'd suggest would be to add a more specific title to the reaction mechanism subheading, just for clarity.

Clarity: -I would just stress reading it over once or twice more just to see if the information sounds clear out loud. I would check over the first paragraph of the "function" section because it has some really long sentences. Perhaps they could be condensed a bit more or even broken into multiple clearer sentences. -Furthermore, I'd read over the sentences once again for grammatical clarity. An example of this is:

"High levels of AMP or phosphate group signifies a low energy state and thus stimulates PFK2."

"High levels of AMP or phosphate group" is talking about two separate groups so it should be signify rather than signifies and therefore stimulate rather than stimulates.

Overall: -I think you did a great job relaying information about PFK-2 by adding in diagrams/pictures and going in-depth about its significance. I'd just read through the whole thing once more just for grammar and clarity's sake. Great job! Mbandla (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism or incompetent editing at Lipid metabolism by editor preceding you; could you review my layperson's attempt to repair?
(Starting attempt now) --Jerzy•t 03:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately I think the error is still there. I'm not 100% sure how to fix it myself! Kedrosolan (talk) 07:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)