User talk:Keegan/October-December 06

WikiLove!


Here's some teak wood for you! Teak wood somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:smile! Happy editing! -- TBC Φ  talk?  11:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Get it? A teak for Teke? Anyhow, long time no see Teke, how are you doing? Also, congrats on your recent RfA. :) (another ackward attempt at comedy by  TBC Φ  talk?  )

Post-block message
Well, it probably was a cute puppy. Joyous! | Talk 03:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Why was Christopher DeJoseph deleted?
He is a writer for WWE and has appeared on television over 4 times. Why would he be deleted? Isn't wikipedia supposed to be an overall encyclopedia? Why not include a currently frequenting character on WWE television? DaHumorist |

Christoper DeJoseph must be re added to wikipedia immediately, has appeared several times as "Big Dick Johnson" on WWE Programming including November 6th edition of Raw, for DX. He must me accounted for.

Talk 02:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll second this. I came to Wikipedia looking for who this was after seeing him several times only to find the deletion. He is at this point a recurring character in addition to being a member of the WWE creative team. Paladin677 07:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey Teke,

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything.

And, as a note, one thing about tis username (which I have had for a while elsewhere on the Internet) is that I've seen people accidentaly use just about every permutation of its three lettters. Don't know whether you ever had that experience as TKE, but just thought I'd share a little anecdote while I'm here. :) — TKD::Talk 05:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Canon PowerShot A520
You speedied this article as promotional. I remember the article, it was about the camera and seemed reasonably balanced, or atleast far from 'blatent'. It may have been suitable for deletion, but I don't know about speedying it. When I bought my camera I went there and found usefull information, so it was not entirely unencyclopedic. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

For a James K. Polk fan
I found this on youtube the other day. Some high school kid made a video for the They Might Be Giants song James K. Polk. Check it out.  young  american (ahoy hoy) 18:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...
... for supporting my RfA. If you need me for anything, do not hesitate to ask.  young  american (ahoy hoy) 21:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for advice ...
Teke,

I appreciate your review of my draft article about the Big-8 Management Board. I'm not sure that I know how to get away from the FAQ/"All About Us" tone of the piece. I'm asking among my acquaintances to see whether there is a third-party who would want to revise it. As far as I can tell, I'm pretty definitely disqualified under the Conflict of Interest rule from submitting the article myself.

There are already articles on Usenet and the Big-8 in Wikipedia:

Big-8 (Usenet) has an external link to the Big-8 Management Board. Maybe that's all that is needed or wanted.

Martin X. Moleski, SJ 03:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Dovico - article deleted ...
Can you please explain why the article on dovico was deleted? The article has relevance as many whitepapers, awards etc. have been written about this company. I was adding them as a simple reference only. As I understand the fact that they are a company, does not warrant exclusion from wikipedia.

This will be linked from this article: Comparison_of_time_tracking_software

Marty25 16:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hii!
Hey dude! Haven't seen you on IRC in awhile! I'm chilling in #wikimedia-social most of the time. Come chill with me! --CableModem^_^ 07:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Ben Harrison
The only problem is that he was never referred to as Benjamin Harrison VI, and he also had an uncle named Benjamin Harrison VI who was marginally notable.  T Rex  | talk  02:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Red labor
I found this message on my talk page :

Hi there. I deleted an article you created, Red labor, as failing our criteria for speedy deletion, specifically A7 as lack of notability and G11 as promotional for a small group. Please do not recreate the article, but continue to edit! Teke(talk) 03:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)"

and I object to you making this a speedy delete instead of normal a AfD.

You cited G11 "Blatant advertising"

Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company, product, group or service as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion: an article that is blatant advertising should have inappropriate content as well. If a page has previously gone through deletion process and was not deleted, it should not be speedily deleted under this criterion.

but I don't believe that the article had "inappropriate content" and request that it be recreated so it can go through an AfD review.

Thanks.JohnRussell 20:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Sup buddy
Sup brotha, how you been? Hows the admin life treating ya? &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  19:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Jones Lang LaSalle
Hi! You deleted this article, as I understand it for "blatant advertising" (G11). I recovered it via google and am surprised because I really don't see what is so bad about it. It is just describing one of the major real estate companies in the world. I c&p it here so maybe you can reconsider. --Kricket 16:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

PS: looked at it again and did a few minor changes, there was bad style in it (posted it under "alternative?" on my talk page. But just deleting an article like this is really overdoing it.


 * Hello Teke! As you didn't answer for a week I just put it back in (with the changes you can see on my talk page). Talk to me if you have any comments. --Kricket 13:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Red Labor on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Red Labor. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JohnRussell 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

Blocked for REMOVING vandalism?
Hi, I actually REMOVED some vandalism from the Cleo Lemon article (Someone had put tt8matador rules!! or something like that) and you apparently blocked me for it. What gives? DasGreggo 04:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)DasGreggo

Re Allah
I have unprotected an article you protected, Allah, since it's been five weeks. Just a friendly heads-up, happy editing to you :) Teke ( talk ) 20:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note Teke. I've just done some un-protections lately and forgot about others in need. Happy editing and happy new year. --  Szvest   -  Wiki me up ®  20:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)