User talk:KeenreViewer

Welcome!
Hello, KeenreViewer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Oommen Chandy have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Rameshnta909 (talk) 19:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Oommen Chandy
Hi KeenreViewer, Wikipedia gives importance to sources to verify the content you add. Everyone knows the result of parliament elections. You have to add a neutral source to verify the content, like a media report. The source should mention about Oommen Chandy's popularity as a factor in the election results. Otherwise it would become original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia. Plz see Verifiability