User talk:Keepgoingbesse

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of the verified oldest people with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of the verified oldest people with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 19:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of the verified oldest people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Clarince63 (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of the verified oldest people, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of the verified oldest people was changed by Keepgoingbesse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980207 on 2012-05-31T19:39:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

new longevity claims
Li Ching-Yuen 1677-1933 256 years old Sharali Muslimov 1805-1973 168 years old Haji Khadem Hossain Sikhdar 1860 living 152 years Zaro Aga 1776-1933 157 years old shigechiyo izumi june 29th 1865-21st feburary 1986 120 years 237 days

What I learned about supercentenarians 5-31-2012
Currently the oldest confirmed human life span currently belongs to Jeanne Calment of france she live and outstanding 122 years and 164 days the oldest man in history is currently in a debate between Shigchiyo Izumi 120 years and 237 days aan Christain mortensen 115 years and 252 days. but guinness has offically decided that the title goes to Christain Mortensen since the are sure that Shigechiyo used his brothers birth certificate as a necronym. Currently we have three people living at the age of 115 and that belongs to Besse Cooper the oldest person Dina Manfredini and Jiroemon Kimura there has been several videos and photos about these people.

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jiroemon Kimura, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jiroemon Kimura was changed by Keepgoingbesse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854721 on 2012-07-21T03:47:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Princess Lalla Khadija of Morocco. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Princess Lalla Khadija of Morocco was changed by Keepgoingbesse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860306 on 2012-07-21T03:53:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at List of the verified oldest people
Hello Keepgoingbesse. In the last 24 hours you've made a series of four edits at List of the verified oldest people which are hard to understand, and have been promptly reverted by others. Please be aware that you can be blocked for WP:Edit warring if this continues. There is a Wikipedia project that has done a lot of work to compile accurate listings. You should listen to their advice if you intend to make large changes to our longevity articles. If you have new information, feel free to make a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Per 1 and 2. EdJohnston (talk) 03:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing disruptive editing. I see no sign that you have any intention of doing anything constructive here at all. Your most recent edit would, if allowed to stand, have caused the figures in the article to become inaccurate after a day. In isolation this might have been seen as a good-faith error, but in the context of your editing history it was clearly nothing of the sort. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)