User talk:Keepittrue789

Welcome!
  Hello, Keepittrue789!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Trojan Horse scandal
Wikipedia encourages editors to just go ahead and change anything that seems wrong or inadequate, but another policy (WP:Bold, revert, discuss) permits other editors who aren't convinced that a change is valid to revert it and invite discussion. Article talk pages is where we tease out the differences of perception and produce an improved text. So reversion does not mean that the changes you want to make are downright wrong, but rather that other editors consider that they are not expressed sufficiently neutrally. Of course you may well feel that the existing text is not neutral either.

To move this forward would you please start a new topic at talk:Trojan Horse scandal and explain the changes you believe should be made – what is wrong (in your opinion) with the existing text, what should replace it and why. You have made a good start by citing your sources, please replicate those citations at the discussion.

Welcome again to Wikipedia. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ to .-- Ponyo bons mots 20:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)