User talk:Keepsleeping/2005Archive

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I thought useful:


 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library
 * Utilities
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Conflict resolution
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Brilliant prose
 * Featured pictures
 * Boilerplate text
 * Current polls
 * Mailing lists
 * IRC channel

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Be Bold!

[[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 21:25, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Scarling.
The Wikipedia music project has sen much discussion concerning the inclusion of catalogue numbers, and the conclusion continues to be that we don't. Also, note the naming conventions (both in Wikipedia and in English more generally) concerning capitalisation in titles (it's Jack off Jill). --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:01, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Be happy to dismotivate one more Wiki-fan
Well fine, feel yourselves like kings here. Make your statements. I'm deleting my account and stop adding something good to that thing. It's not worth it. Because you are not ready to change, to improve. You've made your rules here. But without changes you won't go far. You will be on the same boat. Even rules are a subject to be changed. But you do not comprehend it. It always happens when Philistines have the power. Do it on your own. Bye. Be happy to dismotivate one more Wiki-fan. Ex-fan. Beautifulstranger 22:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Gothic rock
Nice cleanup there. Perhaps you wouldn't mind leaving a comment at Talk:First and Last and Always where a genre-identification disagreement has arisen. Thanks. Jkelly 01:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Trainwreck
I have rewritten this article to establish the notability of this band as per WP:music. Currently, it meets two criteria in having a notable member in Kyle Gass of Tenacious D and having completed a national tour. They have released a live album distributed through Epic/Sony and are working on a sudio album with Gass and John King of the Dust Brothers producing. I would be grateful if you could take a look. Capitalistroadster 01:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Peer review
Thanks for the message &mdash; I'll take a look when I can (I'm barely keeping my eyes open as I type this, and I'm two days behind on my Watchlist); I had a very quick look, and nothing jumped out at me as being a problem. If not tomorrow, then the weekend. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 21:52, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry &mdash; I came down with food poisoning, or a stomach bug, or something, which slowed down by editing; I'm beginning to catch up, and I'll look at it now. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 18:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

2000s One-hit wonders in the United States
I have reverted your edits to this article. You removed several entries on the basis that the artists "have several top 10 hits". I was unable to verify this using allmusic.com, which is the reference we have been using. If you have a more authoritative source, please mention it on the talk page. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 15:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Live in Chicago (Jeff Buckley)
Thanks for cleaning up Live in Chicago (Jeff Buckley). The original article was of such poor quality, it was hard to tell what it was about, and who Jeff Buckley was. It is now clear that it meets WP:MUSIC --Rogerd 00:11, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

George W. Bush
Thanks for helping clean the vandalism up with that article! >: Roby Wayne Talk 17:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I couldn't agree with you more ;-). >: Roby Wayne Talk 17:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

re: Marilyn Manson peer review request.
Hi. Sorry it took so long. I'm gradually moving towards a more permanent Wiki-retirement, but I did get a chance to look over the article.

Overall, the article is excelletn. A few issues to point out;
 * this phrase needs sourcing: "its many devoted fans have made Marilyn Manson a consistently high-profile group". As it stands now, it sounds like a fan patting himself on the back.
 * there need to be definite sources pinning down the most accepted description of Marilyn Manson's sound. A good way to word the header is as follows: Marilyn Manson is a popular rock band from Hollywood, California. Their sound has been described as.... The first sentece should be a definite statement of solid and undisputed fact.
 * Format your references in APA format, with author, publisher, year, place of publication, and (where applicable) page. See Cite sources/example style and Template messages/Sources of articles/Generic citations.
 * Move the personnel list to the end of the article, and introduce your band members (as you have) in the prose.
 * You may consider porting the discography to a "Marilyn Manson discography" page, and summarizing the most notable releases (Hit singles, albums) on the main page. I was asked to do this when I put The Supremes up for FAC, and it seems to work well for acts with long discographies.
 * All of your pictures are promotional pictures of the band's lineup (and all of them use a similar layout). Switch up the layout of the page some, by including album covers, a screencap or two from notable music videos, etc., in place of a few of the lineup pics. And make sure you justify each image as being fair use, as per User:Carnildo (because otherwise, he will object to the article).

But, again, much of this is cosmetic. The article body is informative, solid, and well written, and doesn't dissolve into fawning fangush (as many Wiki music articles do). --FuriousFreddy 02:31, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Crazy in Love
You restored the old chart formatting because...? Does this discussion have to "offically" be passed? If so, then I apologize for my edits. --Hollow Wilerding 02:03, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay. I understand now. Thanks for the clarification. --Hollow Wilerding 20:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Marilyn Manson
I unprotected it. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 10:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

You made a cool edit of Manson's chart listings. I personally wouldn't mind seeing more articles on Marilyn Manson's singles, something which I feel would be cool User talk:LuciferMorgan

Dude.
Your tag is bombing all the Wiki talk pages, and turning them Technicolor green! Fix your formatting! --FuriousFreddy 02:30, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

He beat me to it. It's nothing you did recently, but the HTML-tidy has been turned off. The tags in your signature need to be properly nested; the closing tags (like /font )must be in the reverse order of the opening tags. Monicasdude 03:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

FAC for The West Wing (television)
Thanks for commenting on The West Wing FAC. I believe that we have properly addressed your concerns with the article, and I invite you to come take a second look at the article and reconsider your vote on its FAC. Thank you so much! -Scm83x 10:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * We really have given it quite the makeover, so even just a short review would be greatly appreciated! Staxringold 13:36, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask
Hi, could you please cross out your objections that have been resolved at the above nomination so not to confuse me when addressing the comments? Thank you. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding 22:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I've also addressed your other comments, not just the bottom one. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding 22:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC)