User talk:Keevaymusic

Unspecified source for Image:Catman cohen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catman cohen.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JamesTeterenko 05:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Source of Catman Cohen photo
Mr. Teterenko:

Keevay Music, a BMI publishing company, fully owns the copyright of the photo, having paid $300 consideration to Oliver Thees, for its usage in perpetuity. Keevay Music has made this photo available for FREE to countless websites (including WIkipedia) and has never made a request for compensation and never plans to do so.

Keevaymusic 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging the picture. You should take POV discussion to the talk page or possibly leave a message with the person that left that tag. -- JamesTeterenko 02:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Your rant on my user talk page
Apparently it has not sunk in to your head that anyone can edit Wikipedia. Therefore, when an edit is made to the Catman Cohen article that does not meet with your approval, it is entirely possible that someone other than me made that edit. I have made no edits to that article since May 2006, and I have no intention of making any more. It frankly doesn't interest me that much!

You can post any nonsense you want. Don't expect any further response from me. If someone else disagrees with your personal partisan views about the proper presenation of an article, take it up with that person. Now, do you understand? --Russ Blau (talk) 21:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I have the same issue as Russ. Please do not leave me any more messages.  I have never even touched the article.  -- JamesTeterenko 22:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Catman Cohen
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. JD don't talk email me 19:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Artist Demand for summary removal of article given LIBELOUS labels attached to article
Since the original purveyor of the Artist material is removing the material, it cannot be construed as vandalism in any way shape or form. Nor will ARTIST allow material to remain given the libelous nature of the pejorative labels.
 * Thank you for removing my question without answering it. If you choose not to respond to any communication, any future edits that are seen to be disruptive will be interpreted as vandalism, and you will be warned accordingly.  --JD  don't talk email me 20:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked this account from further editing due to your posting of legal threats. See Wikipedia policy on no legal threats--MONGO 20:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Additionally, since you are now posting legal threats to my email, I am politely asking you to stop.--MONGO 07:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Martha Cohen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martha Cohen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martha Cohen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Harry B. Cohen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry B. Cohen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harry B. Cohen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 03:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph H. Cohen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph H. Cohen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph H. Cohen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)