User talk:Kei Jo/Archive 2

1 Hour Timeshift on UPC channels
Fair enough the UPC page is not a part of WikiProject British TV channels and does need to be up to the same standards and most of the channels are in sequence. Though why you have decided to write "1 Hour Timeshift" is beyond me. English sentences simply do not have capital letters at the start of every word unless you are referring to names, acronyms or initials, it is also against MOS:CAPS. You have also removed part of the information on the simulcast channels, it is unclear what they simulcast from the channel name alone. Your signature of Kei_Jo may also against the rules as it appears to be a user called Kei_Jo (WP:SIGEDITORIMPERSONATE) - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I did not say that you changed the Sky page but the changes you made to the UPC page are still against the MOS. Although there is no user by the name of Kei_Jo, it does not in any way resemble you actual username, so it quite possible that if someone reads your comments without knowing you, they may become confused. It is just a suggestion (While not an absolute requirement, it is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the user name it represents.). It is quite possible to sign up for a username containing an underscore, for example my username does, my signature is the default and I must sign in using the underscore. It is also possible to change your username to Kei_Jo if you wish (Changing username). - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 17:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

List of former TV channels in the UK
Even if it was agreed to add UPC, the pages has not been moved correctly. See WP:MOVE, you do not just copy and paste contents to another page. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 12:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of former channels in the UK and Ireland


The article List of former channels in the UK and Ireland has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Created without trying to gain a conesus

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Help.
helpme Hi, this user: 155.69.192.14 has been editing just 1 article from Oct 20 to present, is there a Wiki shortcut code or information on how I would suggest this person to stop focusing on just 1 article. Also I think they have used another IP address to edit the same article. Maybe 155.69.192.207 and 155.69.192.14 are the same person?? --Kei_Jo (aka Keithf2008) (Talk to me, baby! :P) 00:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Im sorry to say that the other user may be right. It appears that the video is just a video blog. It may be useful for the External Link section, but the video seems to add little information to the article. See Template: Youtube. Tim1357 (talk) 00:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No. There's nothing whatever wrong with only editing one article. If you think they should spread their interest out a little, just drop them a simple note on their talk page.  As for the IPs, I didn't bother to check the contribs, but some IPs jump around, so it's not necessarily sockpuppetry.  Further questions, ask here - I'll be watching! :-]    Fl ee tf la me   ·  whack! whack!  · 00:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * In general, there is nothing wrong with editing only 1 article, especially as a new user. Focus on the subject matter, not the user. This user may have a narrow range of interest of articles to edit, and we all start somewhere. You may want to suggest that the user spreads their interest, but they certainly don't have to comply with your wishes. For your interest, you may also want to read the essay on single purpose accounts. DigitalC (talk) 01:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, I just wanted to clarify that it's ok, so thanks for your helps. --Keithf2008 (talk) 01:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Apologies
I had not intended to revert your changes when I made mine - just realised that had been one side effect of them. Orderinchaos 16:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of You've Got The Love
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is You've Got The Love. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/You've Got The Love. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)