User talk:Keilahcoverstone

February 2022
Hello Keilahcoverstone. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Keilahcoverstone. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ElKevbo (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi ElKevbo, I am employed by SAGU American Indian College as their webmaster and librarian. Although I am not being directly compensated for my edits to the Wikipedia page, part of my job as webmaster is to improve our marketing across the internet. I noticed many incorrect pieces of information on our page, lots that were several years outdated. Because it appears that no one else is making these edits, that is why I did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keilahcoverstone (talk • contribs) 11:00, February 9, 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the quick and helpful response! Most Wikipedia editors are okay if editors with a conflict of interest provide uncontroversial updates to articles, especially if it's information that's already in the article but just needs to be brought up-to-date. More complex edits, especially those that may be contentious, should be requested in the article's Talk page. If you don't get a timely response there, feel to drop a note at WT:UNI, too. ElKevbo (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)