User talk:Keimzelle/Archives/2023/May

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Keimzelle. Thank you for your work on Paul Chevré. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 21:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * - wow, it's the first time I ever get such a nice message. I found Paul Chevré because he was a red link on Titanic.--Keimzelle (talk) 04:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You are welcome! It's a nice article and I was completely unaware of his work, saw it on new page patrol. He made many great monumental sculptures, and it is fascinating he is a Titanic survivor. Cheers! Netherzone (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

A [redacted] vandal [redacted] wants to state his opinion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andres English-Howard. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Not a pissing contest, I tagged it in the hopes you might improve the sourcing to show that they actually were notable. You chose to ignore that advice. I was unable to find any coverage of this person which would pass the PERP or BIO1E issues, so I sent it to AfD, since you made it quite obvious you were not willing to work on the article. Onel 5969  TT me 20:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Andres English-Howard. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Onel 5969  TT me 20:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not tolerate any pissing on my work, which was your clear intention. Your request for deletion contained even a factually wrong reason. How to discuss a deletion when you even haven't read the article? Nope. There's no way.--Keimzelle (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * This is completely unacceptable. It isn't the first time you've been blocked for this, either. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

4
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

is closed as it was neither concise nor clear. Nor did it address the three questions. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * That's to slow down the disruption from multiple non productive requests. Please consider the advice you have been given and wait for UTRS to reset. I do not engage in sub rosa unblock discussions via email. Thanks --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Should reset in about 48 hours -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)