User talk:Keith1952

Speedy deletion of Retirement calculation
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. xenocidic (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I copied what you've written and pasted it below - at present, it's not an appropriate form for a Wikipedia article

Retirement calculation
How much of my pay do I need to save so that I'll have an adequate pension? Many retirement calculators exist on the Web to help answer this common and important question, though some have serious flaws to be discussed here. Traditionally, this is an actuarial calculation as described in actuarial textbooks

However, the ready availability to everyone of computing power has made it easier for everyone to perform their own approximate calculations. There are, however, many opportunities for serious error.

It is possible to do get the most important results of this calculation using graphs, as we will see. In particular, if investment returns equal salary rises in the accumulation phase, then the 'after-inflation' graph of accumulating savings is a straight line. And if the after-retirement investment returns equal the rate of price inflation, then the drawdown of savings is a straight line in real terms.

Keith1952 (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Please take a look at the following,


 * Hi Keith, yes, it was removed as part of the new pages patrol. What I would suggest is, if you want to work this into a decent Wikipedia article (firstly I would suggest you try and incorporate the information into say, Retirement planning) but if you think it needs its own article, work on it in your userspace first, and then you can copy/paste it into the mainspace when it is a complete article. (To edit your userspace, just go to User:Keith1952 or say User:Keith1952/Retirement calculation Thank you for not getting discouraged at the quick removal of your article, and feel free to let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. xenocidic (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Zero_Real_Yield.pdf listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zero_Real_Yield.pdf, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Retirement savings rate if point 996% real.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Retirement savings rate if point 996% real.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)