User talk:KeithD

'''Hello and welcome to my talk page. If you leave me a message, I will reply to it here, rather than making a new entry on your talk page. This is so that the conversation is easy to follow. To keep up to speed with the responses, you can either watch this page for replies, or ask me to cross-post my response to your talk page.'''

'''What are you waiting for? Say hi.'''

Archive 1

Socom 2
Thanks Keith you beat me to the punch reverting that page. I think that user has done that before --JB 16:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

AfD
Thanks for the tip. I was rather lost (new process since last I headed over there.  &mdash; Xoder|&#9990; 21:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. KeithD (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

HELLO
Hello

Just for your information
As for the National Enquirer article, which summarizes the facts in Dee Presley's unpublished book, The Intimite Life and Death of Elvis Presley, I did some further research. The article was published in 1993. In it, Elvis's stepmother, Dee Stanley, indeed confirms that Elvis had an affair with Nick Adams. She also claims that he had a sexual relationship with his mother, which had resulted in Gladys drinking herself to death, and that Vernon had known about this. She further says that Elvis had raped Priscilla, his wife, upon learning that she was leaving him for good, ostensibly to prove that he was still a man, and that he had committed suicide because he had been suffering from bone-marrow cancer. Finally, Dee Presley reveals how Elvis had coerced a teenage fan into a three-day orgy, and fed her an entire bottle of Hycodan (a powerful codeine-based cough syrup) on which she had overdosed.

Earl Greenwood, in his book The Boy who would be King (1990), clearly says that Nick Adams was Elvis's "persistent friend." According to the author, they "shared a mutual enjoyment of prescription drugs," and "Nick became a regular at whatever house Elvis was renting." "Elvis still hated sleeping alone, and he grew close enough to Nick to ask him to stay over on nights he was feeling particularly blue but not up to a sexual confrontation with a woman." When he heard that his friend had died, "Elvis's immediate reaction was to sit on the steps, frozen and mute, then his eyes welled with tears and his body shook, as he rocked himself back and forth, arms clutching his sides. Elvis was devastated and suffered through it for days. He sequestered himself upstairs and could be heard crying through the closed door. ... Elvis talked about how close they had been, particularly after a couple of foursomes, and admitted he had 'spurned' Nick's friendship later, saying he had needed 'room to breathe,' because Nick had wanted 'too much, ya know?'..." The author adds that "some pointed comments were made about the two of them years later by a disgruntled hand Elvis just fired..." "Regardless of any intimacies, Nick didn't kill himself over Elvis - it turned out he had a lot of demons haunting him. But Elvis beat himself over Nick's death for a long time." (See pp. 284-286)

In another chapter of the same book, there are some further remarks about the fact that Colonel Parker had told young Elvis "he needed to sharpen his stage presence and develop an image, and to play up his sexuality and make both men and women in the audience want him. ... The idea that he could control men ... had never occurred to him, until Parker brought it up. Not by sleeping with them but by daring them not to notice his sexual smolder. And he found the thought of being wanted by a man oddly erotic, and it made him feel powerful and superior." (See p. 165) Onefortyone 03:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC) Onefortyone 04:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Why are you telling me this?


 * Once again, we're dealing with weak sources. As I've said time and again, The National Enquirer is not a credible source. An unpublished manuscript, particularly one which seems to be constructed of every possible allegation under the sun, is not a credible source.


 * I'm not going to spend time researching the credibility of the Earl Greenwood book. I've done so with a number of your past sources at length, and discussed their credibility with you, but everything I've said has been entirely ignored by you. If it were a credible source, it would be the very first credible source that you've cited that I've seen. I'm afraid my assumptions of good faith have been all but used up.


 * I will respond to the credibility of the quotes you've provided though. Someone being distraught at their friend dying isn't proof of homosexuality. People are always distraught at their friends dying, or their pets dying. It doesn't mean there's been a sexual relationship with either their friends or their pets.


 * The rest of the quotes are hearsay, and don't report who they were said by or told to. Some of them are making assumptions about Elvis' mindset and thought process, and are thus non-credible.


 * Even if the quotes came from credible sources, and accurately reported what was going on - which due to it being hearsay, and supposedly quoting people but not saying which people, I doubt they do - the quote about Elvis turning down Nick Adams would disprove your theory that Elvis was gay, rather than prove it.


 * You're continuing to push a single agenda, which is a direct or indirect attempt to insert a POV in a number of articles. You're continuing to search for sources which support your theories, rather than assess the credibility and content of all sources, and then draw conclusions from that. Both of those are at odds with an NPOV encyclopaedia.


 * And I still don't know why you've told me these things for my information. KeithD (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I told you these things simply because you said on the Articles for deletion/Gay sex rumors about Elvis Presley page that I "haven't provided the relevant passage from Earl Greenwood's book." See Now I have cited the relevant passage. You also added to the Requests for arbitration/Onefortyone/Evidence page "somewhat of a 'me too' post" in which you, as third party, stated that your "experiences are largely the same as those of Ted Wilkes." See Requests_for_arbitration/Onefortyone/Evidence. I had hopes that you, as an unbiased user, may possibly change your mind now. Onefortyone 10:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Craig
No, Daniel Craig is not gay. That was vandalism to the article that no one caught. K1Bond007 19:56, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ta for letting me know. KeithD (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Group sex


I have to say, snarky as your answer on the refdesk was, it made me laugh out loud. I don't suppose you've ever considered writing an advice column? :-) Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Thank you Bodnotbod for the Barnstar (I've put in the temporary link, and will update it to the archived link when the page is archived). Glad to hear I made you laugh, Mindspillage. Considered writing an advice column, you say? Sounds to me like you've got a problem that you want advice on... KeithD (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

:-)
No problem! I didn't think you had gone through such a dramatic name change :-). Have a good one!  -->: Roby Wayne Talk &bull; Hist &bull; E@ 07:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

WP:MIND
Hello. Round four of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Thursday, December 1. This round will be drastically different from round three; part one will consist of a creative project, and part two will be developed from there. The full details will be released when the round opens. Time and speed should not be major factors in this round; thus, there is no exact opening time for the round as speed will not factor into the scoring. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 00:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Please add Mind Benders/to do to your watchlist to receive further announcements; the NotificationBot is currently down and all notifications will be placed on that page. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy. If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. Special thanks to Fetofs for helping distribute this message.

Test
What test are you talking about? (Unsigned comment by User:TracksZ06).


 * I don't know what you're referring to. Sorry. KeithD 09:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Votes_for_deletion/Pandora_Peaks
Your comment was priceless! LOL! :D Donmega60645 03:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Elvis page
Hi, I see you've had dealings with user Onefortyone before. I was wondering on any advice you can give pertaining to his repeated efforts to disparage celebrity pages with misleading information, that is highly suspect from badly sourced or falsely sourced books. I've been trying to clean this article up - to organize it - and reformat it, to meet wikipedia standards - and he has been a repeated thorn in the side of clean-up insisting on creating long personal essays, containing original research, badly sourced material that takes away from the quality of the article and amounts to disruption of the wikipedia process. Any help would be welcomed in cleaning the article up and with this user. --Northmeister 00:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


 * No practical advice, I'm afraid. It was the protracted grind of that in particular that caused me to step back my involvement in Wikipedia. I believe that he is under some form of probation following past instances. Asking an admin for help might be a good idea. Sorry not to be more helpful. KeithD 08:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Koptalk page
Hi. Could you please advise how to stop people from posting lies, incorrect information and so on? These people are from rival websites and it's simply spoiling Wikipedia. Thanks. www_koptalk_com 15:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * If you think people are posting lies, then you should discuss it on the talk page of Koptalk, and cite your sources. I presume that you are the owner of the actual Koptalk site, which means that you are going to have to make sure that everything you do is above board. There was an incident yesterday when someone tried to change the external links to point away from the critical sites, and rather to point to similar domains owned by the owner of Koptalk. This manipulation was unacceptable, and was reverted.


 * As it stands, the criticisms that have been made have cited their sources. As you haven't cited any counter-evidence, and have just blanked various critical sections, there could be problems. Wikipedia is about verifiability. It isn't about avoiding all criticism or praise. Anything verifiable and notable has a place on Wikipedia. It seems that you have a vested interest in the Koptalk article, which, as I say, means that you should do everything by the book, and discuss it properly on the talk page.


 * For the record, I'm not a registered member of any 'rival site', or of Koptalk itself. I think I posted a couple of times on the official site a few years ago, but that's it. KeithD 14:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Justification
So you have to respond to what claims these muppets say? Everything they says is either spliced or tampered with and you expect us to respond to that? By all means they can leave criticism on articles but when it's clear that an article has been used to publish nonsense it should be sorted out. Anyone with an inch of common sense should be able to identify troublemakers and people who are genuinely criticising. Thanks for your input. www_koptalk_com 15:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I've replied on your talk page. Let's keep all the discussion there, so it's all in one place, and we don't lose the thread of what we're saying. KeithD 14:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

UTorrent move request
Hello. I've requested once again the move of article MTorrent to UTorrent. You voted last time and I just wanted to let you know. Sub versive  12:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

quick question
I'M DOING A REPORT ON ELVIS AND MY THESIS STATEMENT IS, "WHAT KIND OF AFFECT DID ELVIS HAVE ON POP CULTURE?"

ANYONE WANT TO HELP ME OUT HERE?
 * Take a look at Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley KeithD 19:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

UEFA Super Cup
I like that idea about mentioning only the year it was played in. Go ahead and do it!

Bryceia
damn, wish you'd not made that AfD. I AIV'd him, and was going to Speedy that movie article under A3 referencing the AIV. Ah well, let's hope for a snowball. ThuranX 13:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what A3 or AIV mean, but as you say, it should be fairly obvious to everyone that it's a hoax/vandalism and will all get dealt with. KeithD 13:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. AIV - Adminidstrators intervention against vandalism, at WP:AIV. A3 is a category for speedy deletion. Snowball is when everyone's in agreement for a delete and that agrement appears wuickly, like a cartoon snowball growing as it rolls down hill. He's been indef blocked and almost all his images deleted, his contribs reverted. all good. ThuranX 22:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible problem
Are you related to User:Keith D? Simply south (talk) 01:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No. There's no connection between them and me. KeithD (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Malik Abdul Aziz
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. David Pro (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of British footballers who have scored in a European Cup Final
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of British footballers who have scored in a European Cup Final, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of British footballers who have scored in a European Cup Final. Thank you. – PeeJay 17:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello KeithD! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 19 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) David Raven (musician) -
 * 2) FU -
 * 3) Antonio Ruiz -
 * 4) Dino Sani -
 * 5) Jair da Costa -
 * 6) Aristide Guarneri -
 * 7) Fernando Serena -
 * 8) Pierino Prati -
 * 9) Eddy Pieters Graafland -
 * 10) Henk Wery -

11. Sjaak Swart 12. Heinz Stuy 13. Sepp Weiß 14. Udo Horsmann 15. Jürgen Milewski 16. Luciano Favero 17. Massimo Briaschi 18. Eduardo Luís 19. Edward Linskens

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of David Raven (musician)
I have nominated David Raven (musician), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/David Raven (musician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 18:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Nicole Paggi
Oh you spoilsport... ;-)

Nah, just kidding. It's fair enough that the article was changed back - we were planning on doing it ourselves anyway, so thanks for doing it for us. And cheers a lot for watching the video too. Hope that you're doing okay today. :-) Charlyandjosh (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Fu
A tag has been placed on Mr. Fu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bluemask (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Mário João
Hello! Do you know the full name of this Portuguese football player? Many sources adfirm Mário Rodrigues João, while other ones state only Mário João. If you know something more, plese, write me here. --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

West Midlands Fire Service
Hi, West Midlands Fire Service has got a list of people that is mostly unreferenced. Should anything be done? Snowman (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Bitchcakes
Is there any reason you redirected Bitchcakes to NewsRadio?
 * As I haven't got a response within a few days, I'm just going to assume it's vandalism and nominate it for speedy deletion. SalfEnergy 22:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bitchcakes


A tag has been placed on Bitchcakes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SalfEnergy 22:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Peter Swan (footballer born 1966)
Hey, if at all possible could you fill in his season-by-season stats for his Hull days please? And a reference too. Am trying to get GA status, thanks! (can I also have a tb when you reply here, cheers!)--EchetusXe 11:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Idler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Idler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Request
I was wondering if you could possibly vote at Featured list candidates/One Direction discography/archive1. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Formalising the status of WP:FALKLANDSUNITS
The page WP:FALKLANDSUNITS has not yet been formally adopted as an offical guideline. I have created a proposal to regularise the position. Please feel free to comment Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South America/Falkland Islands work group/Units. If the proposal is accepted, then the page will indeed be part of Wikipedia policy, otherwise it will be tagged a "failed proposal". Either way the uncertainty that has dogged this page for the last three years will be resolved. This message is being sent to every editor of good standing who has contributed here or here. Martinvl (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of FIFA world cup squads


The article List of FIFA world cup squads has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Incomplete article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  GreenCricket  (talk)  11:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tantine


A tag has been placed on Tantine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nerd1a4i (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of FIFA World Cup squads for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FIFA World Cup squads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of FIFA World Cup squads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 05:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Xbox compatible listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xbox compatible. Since you had some involvement with the Xbox compatible redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Xbox 360 compatibility listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xbox 360 compatibility. Since you had some involvement with the Xbox 360 compatibility redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phuh
Hello, KeithD

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Phuh, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Geoff &#124; Who, me? 17:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hasty draftspace edit by patrolling editor
As an administrator, could you undo this draftspace edit Draft:Coal Research Establishment - the edit seems overly hasty. There is nothing wrong with the article.

Britain led the world in coal research, and this is where they did that research. I admit a few external links would be good, but the site is a housing estate now, and there's not much available. DinosaursLoveExistence (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Land reform in the Roman republic


The article Land reform in the Roman republic has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:V, WP:NOR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winning players for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winning players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winning players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Seasider53 (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

The Blackpool topic[edit source]
Greetings - I noted you likely are much more of a stakeholder in the Blackpool article - I did make many very bold and strident changes - and I documented them as such in the audit trail of the edits - I do apologize - all edits made in good faith.

Sadly, the reversion by @DragonofBatley deleted many more conservative edits - the sizing of the images is the most notably visual loss of quality by these wholesale resets.

As with most matters there is always a civil middle ground and sure - I have no interest in edit wars and I was crystal clear that I did think my edits - totally pushed the 'consensus boundaries' - but no one reacted negatively - until this day. There are sections in the article's talk section and there was arguably some degree of consensus.

I usually only focus on medical and science articles and there is less room for bombast and group think in such articles -

I did actually think the changes others made - size of images - should be reverted - but I am not getting directly involved.

Kind Regards, Dr. BeingObjective (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)