User talk:Keithallanroe

Hullbridge Sports
Hello Keith. Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contribution to the Hullbridge Sports article, but unfortunately I have reverted your changes for a few reasons: I'm currently abroad, but will have a bash at rewriting the history based on the additional information you supplied at some point in the next week. Cheers, Number   5  7  01:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) The writing style was very unencyclopedic - using phrases like "sadly" is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 * 2) You removed all the references to reliable sources such as the FCHD.
 * 3) Referencing the article to a book you've written yourself is not exactly ideal - best to read WP:COI. Has the book been published? I can't find any record of it anywhere.

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Hullbridge Sports F.C.. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)