User talk:Keithpaulmedelis

Hi there Keithpaulmedelis - just leaving you a note so that your talk page will be enabled. Your talk page allows you to receive and respond to messages on Wikipedia. -- kosboot (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi, Keith! Thanks for your message on my Talk page and I hope your first edits went well. Don't worry, you will have LOTS of support navigating Wikipedia, which is just another skill set. The writing and research will be your focus this semester; but Wikipedia is the big, breathtaking platform for your work. Welcome to Wikipedia! Amy E Hughes (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm Talking To You!
Hey buddy. Wiki-wiki-what? OrangeZabbo (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: Peer Review
Hey Keithpaulmedelis, Thanks for the message. Your topic seemed very interesting to me because I have absolutely no idea what it is at the moment. You know, because looking it up on Wikipedia is the first thing I do when I hear of something I have no idea what it is. From that practical standpoint, I'd be very interested in what Antitheatrical prejudice is and its relevance today. Just my two cents. Decafespresso (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Peer Review
Hi Keithpaulmedelis, I got a chance to look through your sandbox and WOW! I think this looks really well researched and developed so kudos to you for developing this article from scratch. You will certainly will be enriching the wiki community. I, like Decafespresso, did not know what Antitheatrical prejudice is, but your article provides a more than adequate understanding. I think that once you decide to publish the article, it will be well beyond a stub/start. I guess, my only feedback is regarding the timeline for class so maybe adding visual content will enhance it. That being said, I think your lead section and structure are especially strong, as are your citations and references. I look forward to the final product. LMR0804 (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your peer review of La Dafne
Hi, Keith -- I'm sorry that it's a bit confusing, but could you please move your peer review of La Dafne from the article's Talk page to the peer review system on Wikipedia? Your review should be added to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/La_Dafne/archive1 Thanks! Amy E Hughes (talk) 19:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Antitheatrical prejudice
 * added links pointing to The Republic, Rouseau, Timothy Dwight, Ingenue, Francois de La Rochefoucauld and Vanity Fair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antitheatrical prejudice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacobean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antitheatrical prejudice


The article Antitheatrical prejudice has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject exists solely to 'essay' the ideas of a single source, which I do not believe is a distinct topic (prejudice against theatre).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pincrete (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)