User talk:Kejthom/sandbox

Peer Review
Overall, your content was very informative. I thought the level it was written was appropriate for someone who would be reading this Wikipedia page. The only suggest I would give is to find a way to connect it back to psycholynguistics. You talk about how it affects speech, but I would suggest delving in a bit deeper to how speech production is affected, not just the motor aspects. The only other thing that would be to fix your citations. I know that it is apart of a much bigger article, but it might be a good idea to spell out your acronyms in the beginning of your section, some sentences seemed a bit muddled with acronyms. It was a good read though, it flowed really well. Catroger (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)