User talk:Kekeljevic

I have restored the article Phatch as you requested on my talk page, since it was not deleted on the merits after discussion and undeleting per WP:PROD is normally granted pro forma. Please note that this does not mean the article will not be deleted under a different deletion process. The article is a bit spammy with its list of features rather than neutral prose, is unsourced, and does not contain and indication of its importance (see WP:N).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Phatch
Hi Kekeljevic, I've done a quick web search to see if there is now enough interest in Phatch to let it pass our notability guidelines (WP:N). There is a review on Softpedia - note that this is an editor ' s review, not a user-submitted one. This is ideal, and can also be used as a independent source to verify the information in the article. If you need any assistance in this respect, drop me a note. Marasmusine (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2009 (UTC)