User talk:KellenK

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Liposome-graphic-large.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Liposome-graphic-large.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lypospheric vitamin c


The article Lypospheric vitamin c has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of WP:MEDRS - seems to have been put up by a vendor of these products.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lypospheric vitamin c


The article Lypospheric vitamin c has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article appears to be solely for promotional purposes; the only source is a website devoted to the sale of the product described in the article; much of the article is closely paraphrased from the aforementioned website

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geoff Who, me?  23:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lypospheric vitamin c for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lypospheric vitamin c is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lypospheric vitamin c until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Geoff Who, me?  01:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)