User talk:KelliRodriguez

Reverted edits
I've reverted the addition of the two reviews that you posted. Unfortunately Modern Horrors appears to be a WP:SPS in that it's a blog that looks to undergo little to no verifiable editorial process. A closer look at Splash Magazine makes it look like the review from that site is also a self-published source since their website implies that they do not edit or otherwise monitor content on their site before it is posted. They do say that they may alter the material, but I'm getting the impression that this is done in instances when something violates their terms of agreement in some form or fashion. In other words, it looks like almost anyone could write an article for that site, making it unusable as a source. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Interesting approach as all editorial content is based in opinion, not fact which makes source and "verifiable editorial process" a non-issue as long as the content isn't profane and completely out of scope with overall blog and website content. If you look at Dread Centrals list of contributors here: http://www.dreadcentral.com/about-us/ You'll see that the majority of contributors have no special bona-fides, in that respect "just anyone" is indeed writing articles.

Please revise the edit or also remove Dread Central. Having more article content and advertising offers littering your site doesn't equate to authority.

Thanks!