User talk:Kellro

A tag has been placed on Cefnoakpark Bouncer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Useless article that does not add any encyclopedic content.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dr ea my \*/!$! 14:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Please don't create "Lists of famous" horses in the breed articles
I am removing all your "list of famous" X breed of horses that you are creating. These have a tendency to grow exponentially, create edit wars, and wikipedia guidelines discourage creation of lists. The better practice is to create categories instead. To that end, see what I did in Palomino, and if you want to do these lists, create a new category and then place the new category on each famous horse's wikipedia page to make it appear in the list.

If a horse isn't famous enough to warrant a wikipedia article or e worked into the text of an article (NOPV and not commercial promotion), then don't please bother listing it in the related breed or color article either. Remember: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Montanabw (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Cefnoakpark Bouncer
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Cefnoakpark Bouncer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Fire Flame
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fire Flame, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Fire Flame. --  At am a chat 21:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)