User talk:Kelly6484

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British subject, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: British subject was changed by Kelly6484 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966862 on 2011-11-16T23:25:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British subject. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --   Luke      (Talk)   23:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oregon Trail, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Oregon Trail was changed by Kelly6484 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952993 on 2011-11-16T23:31:04+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Oregon Trail. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)