User talk:Kelly Stafford1

August 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Fei noh a  Talk, My master 19:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop adding unsourced biographical material to Kelly Stafford. If you are the lady in question, it is a conflict of interest (as noted above). If you are not the lady in question, unsourced biographical material of living persons causes a real problem for Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please limit your edits in this article to correction of gross factual errors. (Eye color, date of birth, legal name, etc).  All other information is inadmissible without proper third party sources.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)