User talk:Kellyannasmith

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brian Metcalf has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brian Metcalf was changed by Kellyannasmith (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871711 on 2020-08-17T08:19:23+00:00

Kellyannasmith, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Metcalf, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Brian Metcalf, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 22:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Adverse (film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 22:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Paid editing disclosure required
Hello Kellyannasmith. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kellyannasmith. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Jezebel's Ponyo I am receiving no compensation just because I am a fan that follows the career of certain people and their films. I have never received compensation nor will I in the future. I am only trying to help out people who need it.

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Brian Metcalf, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 10:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)