User talk:Kellyyyyy123/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

-The article draft "Street Food" is very clear and well expanded. Kelly provides new information which improves the article. Nothing really impressed me but I was happy to learn that Jamaican Jerk Chicken is a traditional dish served in the Caribbean Islands ( thanks Kelly's draft ).

2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?

-NO

3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain.

-The article concentrates on objective reality and information. NO negative or positive information- neutral information.

Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic.

4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?

-The article doesn't draw any conclusion just gives the reader the opportunity to learn about street food. Most statements covered by reliable source.

5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? '

- No.

6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

-NO

7. Write your name followed up by "Lior Nesher (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)"