User talk:Kelpin/Archives/2007/November

Porcupine
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. It was a bot edit; they hadn't noticed my rename!--Porcupine (prickle me!) 12:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * (in response to your question on my talk page)
 * The discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive310 resulted in the redirects being deleted (a decision which I didn't object to, although I don't consider it preferable) - see the deletion log here.


 * I had to delete it again because a bot recreated it, and I then added it to a protected titles list to avoid further recreations. It won't be fixed by recreating the redirect, as consensus has (apparently) spoken. You could always adjust the link on your local talk page, though.  Daniel  01:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:Civility
Hello, Kelpin, the report was piled by myself separately, and then Jeremey distorted it. The report included definately irrelevant matters with Korean cuisine report. You need to read throughly before saying something to me. --Appletrees (talk) 10:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes he did, he put his opinion as a representer on top of my report and then moved my report right below Korean cuisine report. And then integrated the separated reports by him. If you fail to see it, take a time to look closely to the page. I can't assume your behavior like this is from a good faith.--Appletrees (talk) 10:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't complain your failure to find the evidences. I think you're doing more than civility like a threat. --Appletrees (talk) 10:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Why would I make a new ani report on you? I'm not the kind of person like Jeremy. The reason I reported the South Korea incident separtely is I don't want to get such the chagrin frame like "ultranationalistist's battle ground". There were no Japanese in the case. The looks very chaos, but I couldn't bear the frame. The case was merely a vandalism and wikistalking. Don't make things biased. --Appletrees (talk) 11:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)