User talk:Kelvin 101/Archives4

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Dumping Ground Title Card.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:The Dumping Ground Title Card.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ITV2 HD 2013 New Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:ITV2 HD 2013 New Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ITV3 HD 2013 New Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:ITV3 HD 2013 New Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ITV4 HD 2013 New Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:ITV4 HD 2013 New Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:HMV.com Administration Message.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:HMV.com Administration Message.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of lost television broadcasts in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross Roads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:M.I High Series 6 Tiltle Card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:M.I High Series 6 Tiltle Card.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Spectrum Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Spectrum Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Esprit d'amour
Hi Kelvin,

I'm going through the article and I'd change a few things before submitting it for a GA review.
 * The plot fails WP:FILMPLOT because it's about 100 words too long. Try to trim any unnecessary info that is not required to understand what happens in the film. I'd do it but I have to admit I haven't seen this film.✅
 * "Maggie Cheung, future star of the movie In the Mood for Love was originally meant to play the role of Siu-Yu, but was rejected by director Leong Po-Chih.". Does this have a source? I don't think you need to state other films she'd be in unless it related to the other production staff, because that's more about her career than Esprit d'amour.✅
 * "According to Ringo Lam around one third of the film had been shot when Leong resigned, arguing with producer Karl Maka. In need of a quick and inexpensive replacement Maka gave the previously unknown Ringo Lam his big break. In an interview Lam explained, "I have no choice, I need food, so I do the best I can..." Lam received sole directing credit for the movie." I would slightly re-phrase this.✅
 * I'm not sure if lovehkfilm.com falls under WP:RS as it's self-published material. Try to see if there any reviews of the film from books.google.com. This is always a hard part because finding critic reviews of older Hong Kong films I find to be very difficult. Failing that, try to use interviews with actors and stars from the film where they talk about the film's reception. Maybe since it was only nominated one award at the Hong Kong film awards, use that as prose opposed to table.
 * The Classification might have to be removed per WP:FILMRATING. Unless it's related to the film's history, like in the article for Hard Target, Woo had to battle the producers who wouldn't let him get an R-Rating for the film so it was edited several times before it could be released.✅
 * Throughout out the section, there are many headings and sub-headings for very short articles. I would remove them unless the production section gets much larger. Just seperate them as paragraphs.✅
 * The home video section has a lot of information, but some reviewers may object to using yesasia as a source, since it's just a site used to sell film rather then being a film database or a historical thing. Some might see it as trivial. It might be good if you could change prose and write about if some of the home video copies have different film lengths or if some are cut in any way if you can get that information.
 * The previous GA review said some links were dead, I haven't checked, but you might want to re-examine them.✅

That's all I can think of for now. If you could take a minute to go over my article I've cleaned up for Yes, Madam, that would be much appreciated too. ;) Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Kung Fu Hustle
I've started the review for Kung Fu Hustle. It looks to be in good shape as a whole, but I did note a few concerns on the review page. Let me know your thoughts, and thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Initial comments
This looks very strong on first pass, as I'd expect from a former featured article that was only narrowly delisted. I've made some copyedits and prose tweaks as I went; please feel free to revert anything you disagree with, and doublecheck that I haven't accidentally added any new errors. Anything I couldn't immediately fix is listed below. Out of this, the biggest issue is probably the original research in the parodies/references section. Let me know your thoughts, and thanks again for your work. -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Of Mice and Men ✅ Palm of Ru Lai ✅ The Return of the Condor Heroes ✅ Internal Affairs ✅ Blues Brothers ✅ Untouchables ✅ The Godfather ✅ For Whom the Bell Tolls ✅ Raging Bull ✅ Way of the Dragon ✅
 * "After achieving commercial success with Shaolin Soccer,[2] Columbia Pictures Film Production Asia began to develop Kung Fu Hustle in 2002. " -- Did Columbia Pictures also develop Shaolin Soccer? The later description implies it was another company.✅
 * "Kung Fu Hustle was produced with a budget of US$20 million" -- I'm not sure this detail belongs under the header "choreography".✅
 * "Yuen managed to take seemingly outdated wuxia fighting styles like the Deadly Melody and Buddhist Palm and recreate them on the screen with his own imagination" -- This perhaps verges on opinion, with the strong implication that Yuen succeeded at something difficult. "recreate them on the screen with his own imagination" is also so vague that it could simply be cut. I'd suggest either attributing this in-text, or rewrite it more neutrally, e.g., "In his choreography, Yuen drew on seemingly outdated wuxia fighting styles like the Deadly Melody and Buddhist Palm."✅
 * "under high resolution" -- would it be better to say "in high resolution"?✅
 * "Having lost the Taiwanese film market in the late 1980s following a visit to China" -- What does it mean to say he "lost the market"? Is the sense here that he became unpopular?✅
 * "Sing studied the same Buddhist Palm style" -- the same as what?✅
 * "In reality, it does not leave palm-shaped craters and holes on impact." -- this is a real style as well? the previous sentence indicated it was just a wuxia film.✅
 * The comparisons to Of Mice and Men, Palm of Ru Lai, The Return of the Condor Heroes, Internal Affairs, Blues Brothers, Untouchables, The Godfather, For Whom the Bell Tolls, Raging Bull, and Way of the Dragon appear to be original research--is there any source that contains these comparisons that could be included here? I'm not sure this information is worth including if it doesn't appear in any sources.
 * "As a result, Kung Fu Hustle 2 is slated for a 2014 release" -- Is this still accurate? The source appears to be a dead link from 2005.✅
 * "An MMO 2D side-scrolling fighter game based on the film is currently undergoing closed beta testing in Taiwan, and is due for release in 2010." -- This paragraph clearly needs to be updated.✅ -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lovefilm DVD Envelope.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lovefilm DVD Envelope.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Esprit d'amour GAR again?
I see that you renominated the film, even though some of my suggestions have not been implemented. I will be watching to see what the new reviewer has to say. In case you care to have a look at one that I think meets GA, I will soon be nominating a another film article that I have been working on, which is Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. I think it is almost good enough now; needs more summary info in the lead, and maybe some grammar tweaks. Good luck. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  19:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

File:BBC Two HD.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BBC Two HD.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Asian film Infoboxes Merging
As you participated in the discussion to keep/merge the various Asian film Infobox templates, I'd like you to look over and hopefully contribute to how they will be merged. Thank you for your input. ₪Rick n Asia₪ 16:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:The Best of The Crystal Maze.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Best of The Crystal Maze.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Crystal Maze Series 3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crystal Maze Series 3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Crystal Maze Series 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Crystal Maze Series 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:I cracked the Crystal Maze 1990.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:I cracked the Crystal Maze 1990.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Torchwood GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 18:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll be undertaking this review. The first point to note is the number of unsourced statements in the article that I consider sufficiently controversial/possible to source to merit a citation at GA ("direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons"): This is a lot and I realise it will take some time to complete: for that reason, I am placing the article on hold for seven days but if there has been progress by that time I will keep the article on hold and provide a fuller review. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC) In light of the large amount of work needed, and the 12 days that have passed since the above comments, I think the best thing would be for me to give as much feedback on some of the other criteria and close the review as a fail - it can be renominated once the concerns are addressed. Layout/balance - summary style suggests that the "Themes" section is too short: even where a subpage exists, it should provide a decent summary of that content. This should be expanded (and referenced, as above). The "Parodies" section is given too much space, by contrast; it forms a relatively small part of what the reader is interested in. Reducing some of the detail would be a big improvement there. Overall structure seems fine. Images one non-free file, which has, apparently, been reviewed and kept before (it might be good to link this on the file description page). Prose - no significant problems.✅ Neutral, stable - no concerns.✅ Referencing - the citations needed are given above. Remember the text of citations can remove ugly and unnecessary block capitals. The following other references need further attention
 * The first series includes content rarely seen or heard in the Doctor Whofranchise, including sex scenes, same-sex kissing, and use of extreme profanity in several episodes.✅
 * Due to the level of interest in the show from younger audience members, despite the adult themes, the BBC decided to craft the second series such that a "child-friendly" edit of the shows could go out at 7 pm (pre-watershed). This had the effect that many of the more adult themes ceased to be central to the main episode plot, so they could be more easily edited out for the child-friendly edition.✅
 * Series 3 was produced by Peter Bennett. Series 4 is produced by Kelly A Manners, with UK filming produced by Brian Minchin, producer of Series 4 and 5 of The Sarah Jane Adventures. The series also shares Doctor Who's production designer, Edward Thomas. Music for the series is composed by Ben Foster and Doctor Who's composer Murray Gold, with composerStu Kennedy assisting on Series 4.✅
 * In lieu of full-length title sequence, the opening sequence of the show's first two series are composed of a voice-over monologue by Barrowman as Harkness, establishing the show's premise. The show's theme tune plays over this monologue and the additional intertitle. As in Doctor Who (2005–present), it is written by Murray Gold. (a partial citation would suffice here)✅
 * This reflected the in-universe story of Adam psychically inserting himself into the team members' memories as a long-standing member of the team.✅
 * However, Suzie was killed off at the end of the first episode with Gwen taking her place on the team, Suz✅
 * the military base scenes in "Sleeper" and the booby-trapped abandoned warehouse scenes in "Fragments" were filmed at RAF Caerwent, near Chepstow, south Wales.✅
 * Torchwood explores several themes in its narrative, in particular LGBT themes. Various characters are portrayed as sexually fluid; through those characters, the series examines homosexual and bisexual relationships. The programme also addresses issues around existentialism, the nature of human life and the absence of a traditional afterlife, and the corrupting nature of power.✅
 * The magazine emulated Doctor Who Magazine in combining behind-the-scenes features with original story content in the form of a serialised comic strip and short stories; as the magazine's run progressed, the original fiction became more predominant. The magazine was discontinued in early 2011 after two-dozen issues.✅
 * Titan published six issues of a monthly Torchwood comic book in 2009 for North American markets; the comic consisted of reprints of the magazine's comic strips and short stories, and was cancelled in the wake of the parent publication folding.✅
 * Accompanying the main series of Torchwood are a series of novels. The books are published in paperback-sized hardcover format, the same format BBC Books uses for its New Series Adventures line for Doctor Who. These novels were later released, abridged, as audiobooks. Several audio-exclusive readings have also been produced. To date all of the core cast members from the first two series have narrated at least one abridged or audio-exclusive reading.✅
 * In its third series, the Doctor Who parody Nebulous also began to parody Torchwood, with references to "baby dinosaurs falling through a hole in time" and "the sheer amount of paranormal activity in the Cardiff area alone ... starting to threaten the Earth's plausibility shield".✅
 * Satirical impressionist television series Dead Ringers also parodied Torchwood, with Jon Culshaw playing Captain Jack and Jan Ravens as Gwen Cooper. The sketches parodied the level of sex in Torchwood, claiming "we never deal with an alien unless at least one [of the team] has shagged it", and describing the lack of motivations of the characters. It also parodies the bisexuality of the characters and the melodramatic personality of Jack, who in the sketch walks extremely dramatically, swinging his coat about himself. (unless in ref 101)✅
 * According to the overnight figures, the mini-series garnered an average rating of 5.88 million viewers. According to official figures, published by Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB), all five episodes of the mini-series garnered more than 6 million viewers, with the fourth episode gaining the largest audience.✅
 * In Israel, the first 3 series aired on yes Stars Action and currently available on HOT V.O.D services, in HD also.✅
 * Miracle Day has only been shown in Australia on UKTV but not as yet on the ABC although the series is available on DVD and Blu-ray home video formats.✅
 * The Europe section✅
 * Series two began airing on Space on 8 August 2008 and series three was aired on Space over five consecutive nights in July 2009. Space has since broadcast series 1 and repeated series 2. The series also airs in high definition on HDNet.✅
 * Miracle Day is sometimes repeated on Starz InBlack.✅

(more details, fixing, or tidying): (needs better source), Lead - decent length, but needs a fuller mention of themes, international broadcasts, and radio/audio book adaptions.✅ Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 14:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Ref number not accurate search by title
 * #4 Inside the Hub: The Unofficial and Unauthorised Guide to Torchwood Series One (not sure what wrong)✅
 * #6 Doctor Who showrunner Russell T Davies talks about Torchwood spin-off series✅
 * #12 Attitude✅
 * #37 Doctor Who Magazine 384 (Asking Doctor Who fans to check magazine issue)
 * #38 Shannonsulivan.com✅
 * #41 Radish, Christina (5 November 2010). "Executive Producer's Russell T Davies & Julie Gardner Exclusive Interview TORCHWOOD: THE NEW WORLD"✅
 * #42 Hogan, Heather (8 August 2011). ""Torchwood" Gets Even Darker With a "Final Solution✅
 * #48 John Barrowman rocks the TCA house AfterElton.com✅
 * #56 By MICHAEL AUSIELLO, TV Columnist. "Bill Pullman Joins 'Torchwood' as Regular –". Deadline.com✅
 * #58 Hibberd, James. "'Six Feet Under' star Lauren Ambrose joins 'Torchwood' – EXCLUSIVE". Entertainment Weekly.✅
 * Ref number not accurate search by title
 * #73 Link to the first instalment of Monster Files on the official Doctor Who website (viewable only in the UK).✅
 * #114 Bafta Cymru Nominations ✅
 * #151 Torchwood: Series 1–4 Box Set [DVD]: Amazon.co.uk: John Barrowman, Eve Myles, Gareth David-Lloyd, Burn Gorman, Naoko Mori, Tom Price, Mekhi Phifer, Alexa Havins, Kai Owen, Bill Pullman, Andy Goddard, Ashley Way, Euros Lyn, Richard Stokes, Kelly A Manners, Russell T Davies, Chris Chibnall, Jane Espenson: Film & TV". Amazon.co.uk.✅
 * #171 Torchwood: Series 1–4 Box Set [Blu-ray]: Amazon.co.uk: John Barrowman, Eve Myles, Gareth David-Lloyd, Burn Gorman, Naoko Mori, Tom Price, Mekhi Phifer, Alexa Havins, Kai Owen, Bill Pullman, Andy Goddard, Ashley Way, Euros Lyn, Richard Stokes, Kelly A Manners, Russell T Davies, Chris Chibnall, Jane Espenson: Film & TV". Amazon.co.uk. Retrieved 5 December 2011.✅
 * #178 Imparja drops Torchwood. 5 February 2008.
 * #179 Eleven snaps up Torchwood. Retrieved 2 March 2012.✅

Orphaned non-free media (File:I cracked the Crystal Maze 1990.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:I cracked the Crystal Maze 1990.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conflict (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rapid Discount Outlet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rapid Discount Outlet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rapid Discount Outlet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 23:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Remaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:IT Crowd Cast German Version.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IT Crowd Cast German Version.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs) 02:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm reviewing this article. It's my practice to do a general review by filing out the template, and then do a more thorough prose and source review. See below. Note: I'm using this review for the GA Recruitment Centre, so I expect to be more descriptive of what I do during it. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 02:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria An interesting article about a topic I don't know much about--Chinese cinema--so it was fun to learn about it. There are some minor prose issues which should be easily resolved. At first glance, I notice that many of sources are from pop culture websites that not every reviewer would accept as reliable. However, given the subject matter and the need for comprehensiveness, I find them acceptable. See below for a more comprehensive prose and source review. Also at first glance, most of my concerns with this article have to do with MOS issues; also see below.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * I have minor issues with the prose here; see below for a more thorough review.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * As I state above, I'm unfamiliar with Hong Kong cinema, so I looked around at other similar articles. Unfortunately, there aren't any Hong Kong action comedy film GAs to compare this with.  (Or fortunately, because this may the first!) ;) The closest I was able to find was The Killer (1989 film), which is a "Hong Kong action and crime film".  I have two MOS issues.  The first is the "Plot" section.  At about 600 words, it fits within the suggested length (400-700 words; see WP:FILMPLOT.  I'm not sure, though, if it's got enough of a a real-world perspective.  The Killer's article is a good example of a plot summary written from a real-world perspective; also see WP:Real world.  (I'll go into more examples and suggestions during my prose review.)  Finally, I'm not sure what I think about the "Parodies and references" section; it strikes me as too close to a "Trivia" section, which is generally forbidden.  See WP:TRIVIA.  Mind you, this is a guideline, and as it states, there are exceptions.  I can understand why this section is included in this article, since a theme in the film are the many references to other films, ect, as well as the source of much of its humor.  I wonder if the solution is to re-name the section; perhaps you should strike "Parodies" and just name it "References" or "References to other works".  Let me think about it a couple of days and see what I come up with.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * It's good practice to check your sources, and make sure they're up-to-date and unbroken. I suggest that you go through them and update the access dates; it's a good idea if they're less than a year old.
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * I'm reserving judgment about this until I do a more thorough source review; see below.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * I need to look more closely at your sources, which may not be the most reliable, although I recognize that sometimes one must abandon reliability for scope, especially for articles about movies. Of course, that often means that it may not have the potential to advance to FAC, and that may be the case here.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Checking the article history, there is little controversy here; it's edited by a few main editors. As a matter of fact, the last edit was 16 June.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * I admit that I'm not the best judge of images, but I'm letting it pass since the criteria for GAs is less strict. I suggest getting a second opinion.  Are there any free images of any of the actors, producers, or writers?
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'll reserve judgment for now, until after my prose and source review.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'll reserve judgment for now, until after my prose and source review.
 * I'll reserve judgment for now, until after my prose and source review.

Prose review
Lead Plot
 * Kung Fu Hustle is a 2004 Hong Kong action comedy film directed, co-written and co-produced by, and starring, Stephen Chow. Breaks the parallel structure grammar rule.  How about breaking it up, like this: "Kung Fu Hustle is a 2004 Hong Kong action comedy film.  It was directed, co-written, and co-produced by Stephen Chow, who also had the lead role."✅
 * The other producers were Chui Po-chu and Jeffrey Lau, while the screenplay was co-written... "While", although it's a conjunction, isn't the best choice here because it implies that the screenplay was being co-written at the same time the movie was produced.  I'd simply replace it with "and".✅
 * After the commercial success of Shaolin Soccer, by the production company Star Overseas, they, together with Columbia Pictures Film Production Asia began to develop Kung Fu Hustle in 2002. Unclear sentence construction.  How about: "After the commercial success of Shaolin Soccer, its production company, Star Overseas, began to develop Kung Fu Hustle with Columbia Pictures Film Production Asia in 2002."✅
 * Although the film features the return of a number of retired actors famous for 1970s Hong Kong action cinema, it contrasts with other martial arts films released at around the same time that have made the biggest impact in the West, such as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Hero. Unclear and too long; plus, it's unclear how the two phrases are connected.  How about: "The film features a number of retired actors famous for 1970s Hong Kong action cinema, yet has been compared to contemporary and influential martial arts films such as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Hero."✅
 * I've already talked about the in-universe style of this section. As I stated above, I think that you should change it to be more like The Killers article.  For example, the first two sentence of the section are too dramatic for an encyclopedic article.  I think that if you changed the tone, many of the other prose issues would be resolved.  I can help you with this if you like, and can copy-edit it for you if you like.✅

Cast: Isn't "Kung Fu" always capitalized? If so, please change, not just here but throughout the article.✅

Development
 * Major inspiration for the film came from martial arts films Chow watched as a child and his childhood ambition to become a martial artist. Passive voice, so I'd change it to active.  How about: "Chow was inspired to create the film by the martial arts films he watched as a child and by his childhood ambition to become a martial artist."✅
 * He grew up in an environment similar to the Alley... Where'd he grow up?  I think including that information is important, even for those of us who don't know China well.✅
 * He grew up in an environment similar to the Alley, and the plot included many aspects of his former daily life. The source doesn't say anything about his former daily life influencing the plot. It states: "The Pig Sty is exactly what I lived in the past, the same shape, same kind of building, same situations, a lot of people living together."  It's kind of an important statement, so I'd just quote him.✅

Choreography
 * I think this section is misnamed; it's about more than just the choreography. As per the Film MOS, perhaps "Filming"?✅
 * Production suffered a setback when Hung quit... Unencyclopedic; how about just removing everything before "Hung quit"?✅
 * To replace Hung, Chow immediately contacted Yuen Woo-ping... I suggest that you avoid starting sentences with a preposition.  You don't need to say that Chow "immediately contacted" Woo-ping.  How about: Hung was replaced by Yuen Woo-ping..."✅
 * Yuen promptly accepted the offer, and certain scenes that had been in production under Hung were cancelled. Ref 13 supports the sentence before, but not this one.  I suggest that you either find a source or remove the sentence.  If you find a source, what scenes were cancelled?✅

Casting
 * Kung Fu Hustle pays tribute to many celebrated veterans of Hong Kong action cinema of the 1970s. "Many celebrated veterans" is a bit peacocky to me.  I'd replace it with "several actors who became famous in..."✅

Music': Does your sources explain the differences in the Chinese and American versions? If not, no biggie; I was just curious.✅

Parodies and references
 * As I state above, I think you should change the name of this section.✅

Releases
 * Kung Fu Hustle had its world premiere at the 2004 Toronto International Film Festival. This is an international film, so you don't need to mention that this was its "world premiere".  You could just state that it premiered at the festival.✅
 * In the same way, the Italian and Spanish titles... In the same way as what?  I don't think you need that phrase; I suggest cutting it.✅

Reception
 * Film critic Roger Ebert described the film as being "like Jackie Chan and Buster Keaton meet Quentin Tarantino and Bugs Bunny". The comment was printed on the promotion posters for Kung Fu Hustle in the US. Cool quote; Ebert was so awesome.  I think this would flow better if you combined these two thoughts.  How about: "Film critic Roger Ebert description of the film ("like Jackie Chan and Buster Keaton meet Quentin Tarantino and Bugs Bunny"), was printed on the promotion posters for Kung Fu Hustle in the US."✅


 * Much of the criticism for the film was directed at its lack of character development and a coherent plot. Las Vegas Weekly, for instance, criticised the film for the lack of a central protagonist and character depth. I suggest that you re-word these sentences, to vary the language a bit. "Lack of" is used too many times.✅

Sequel: In 2005, Chow asserted that there would be a sequel... "Asserted" isn't the best choice here; how about "announced" or even "stated"?✅

Online and PS3: This short section needs a copy-edit; it mixes tenses. I think that you should state that the game has not yet been released earlier.✅

Ok, that's it for now. I'll put a note on the nominator's talk page informing him of the review. You have a week (until 7/10) to respond to these comments; if there's no response (as was the case in its first GA), I'll fail it. Good luck! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Other Things to do
 * Write about the censorship in the United States DVD/Blu-ray and how id differs and that a uncut version was later released in the US.✅
 * Mention the DVD special edition with the inflatable axe.✅ Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Source review

 * According to WP:LEADCITE, it's unnecessary to include references in the lead, except to support exceptional and controversial claims, and for quotes. Nothing in the lead can be classified in that way, so I suggest that you remove them.  Of course, that means that you're going to have to redistribute them.  I checked for source links for a few, to make sure that nothing was broken, and they were good.  I have some issues with how some of them are utilized; for example, ref 6 just states that the Hong Kong Chinese Orchestra performed the film's soundtrack, not the type of music.  The point is somewhat moot, anyway, since you make the same claim later on and support it with a different ref.✅
 * Ref 1 is formatted incorrectly; the article's URL and Box Office Mojo belong in different tags. Use the WP:CIT templates.✅
 * Ref 4: Using IMBD is frowned upon. I suggest that you remove it, since it doesn't support any claims anyway.  ✅


 * Ref 20: What are the question marks for? Make sure that you've formatted your refs correctly.✅

correctly (i.e., no close paraphrasing, they support your claims). Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Some of the refs are in Chinese. I don't speak it, so I'm assuming good faith (AGF) that you've incorporated them✅
 * I agree with the tag; ref 47 (IMBD) is unreliable. Please remove content or find a more reliable source. ✅

Kung Fu Hustle review
Hi, I see that you've transcluded the review here on your talk page, but for some reason, the entire review hasn't appeared. There's more to it; I suggest that you go to the articles's talk page to see them. Thanks, it was fun to learn about a new topic! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Here's the mail! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Kel, I really wish you hadn't put the GA review over here; it makes things really confusing. I ask that you respond to my feedback on the review page, where it belongs. What in the heck does the yellow highlighting mean? Also, let me know if you want to accept my offer of copy-editing assistance. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, you might have noticed that I've passed the article, since with my copy-edits, I feel like it now satisfies the criteria. I did have a few more questions, but if you addressed them after the fact, that's fine, since I didn't think they needed to be resolved before passing it to GA. I'd like to share with you some advice about the GAC process, if I may; you can, as they say, take it or leave it. (1) As I request above, it's better if you address the feedback/comments of a GAC at its original site--on the GAC page. That way, it's in just one place for the reviewer and, in the future, for others to refer to it. That doesn't mean you can't place part of it on your talk page so you can a place to refer to as you work, though. (2) I highly suggest that you prepare for a review better. Make sure, at the very least, that it satisfies the GA criteria. One of my WP pet peeves is editors using the review process (both GAC and FAC) to get feedback and editorial assistance. I don't think that's the place for it, but fortunately, this is WP and there are lots of other options. You could simply ask an editor you respect to copy-edit and/or peer review it informally. (I'm always happy to do so; all you have to do is ask, and unless I'm swamped, I'll agree.) You can also submit an article at Peer review and/or the WP:GOCE. Over-preparation is always best; it makes everyone's life (even yours) much easier. Just yesterday, I had two of my GAs pass with almost no trouble. Anyway, good luck in the future, and any time I can help with one of your articles, please let me know. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Imagine Film Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Gareth Evans, Richard Kelly, Braindead, Calvaire, Tempus Fugit, Dark City, Next door, The Raid and Let the right one in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563114104 your edit] to Kung Fu Hustle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Paris Comic-con) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Paris Comic-con, Kelvin 101!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This page is reviewed"

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Happy Ghost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cinema City


 * Paris Comic-con (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Comic-Con


 * Parris Comic-con (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Comic-Con

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Cinema City & Films Co.) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Cinema City & Films Co., Kelvin 101!

Wikipedia editor Dr. Kadzi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This page does not note any citations."

To reply, leave a comment on Dr. Kadzi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Parris Comic-con
Not entirely sure what you meant by this edit. If you want the page to be deleted then tag it with and an admin will come and delete it for you. Hut 8.5 15:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

HK Magazines
Hi Kelvin. Can you read Chinese? I found this site which has tons of old HK film magazines. Maybe there is some useful information in them? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Torchwood GA
Hey K, here's the mail! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinema City & Films Co., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horror and Raymond Wong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Torchwood
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Torchwood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Kelvin 101 -- 13:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Question
Are you trying to review your own GA nomination? I don't understand what's going on. You can't really review your own nominations.  Bramble claw  x  14:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to, but you'll probably find someone who does here: Good article help  Bramble claw  x  15:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Crystal Yu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Chinese, English, Mandarin and George Swift

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man (film)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Ip Man (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- 03:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your FLC nomination of List of Doctor Who DVD and Blu-ray releases
Hi, regarding - please see WP:FLC where you have omitted steps 3 to 5. -- Red rose64 (talk) 21:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man (film)
The article Ip Man (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ip Man (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- 17:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

File:A Town Called Mercy.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Town Called Mercy.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:The Power of Three.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Power of Three.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Asylum of the Daleks.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asylum of the Daleks.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Dinosaurs on a Spaceship.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dinosaurs on a Spaceship.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who The Name of The Doctor.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who The Name of The Doctor.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who The Crimson Horror.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who The Crimson Horror.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who Cold War.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who Cold War.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who Hide.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who Hide.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who The Rings Of Akhaten.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who The Rings Of Akhaten.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Doctor Who The Bells Of Saint John.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who The Bells Of Saint John.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Ip Man Ga Review
The review for this article has begun. Just a friendly reminder! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Likewise! It was a pleasure. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man (film)
The article Ip Man (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ip Man (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- 17:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

HK Magazines
Nuts. I was hoping you would be able to read it. Thanks for showing me that link. I'll take advantage of it when needed but I don't even know if any articles specifically in those magazines are of any use. That's why I was hoping someone who knew the language could thumb through them to read it and figure out if they had anything of use. Oh well. Worth a shot. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

The Dr.
I just sent a reminder email to his agent. There is a new image at commons but it isn't the best. File:Peter Capaldi 2009 (cropped).jpg--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569770361 your edit] to QI may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * QI XL series 6,7 and 8 are available on [Netflix] but can only be streamed in the United Kingdom and Ireland. {{cite web|title=QI Xl

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571237780 your edit] to Mrs. Brown's Boys may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571252997 your edit] to Big and Little Wong Tin Bar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 'Big and Little Wong Tin Bar'' also know as Seven Little Valiant Fighters (  {zh|t=橫掃江南七霸天})/Two of a Kind is a 1962 Hong Kong film. The film is
 * *Yam Yin - as Lotus

Doctor Who article
Hey Kelvin, I noticed you nominated Doctor Who for GA again. You might want to sort out the tag on the Spoofs and cultural references section as it would currently qualify for another quick fail (which I nearly just did, but I realised I did that previously in April and I didn't want it to seem like I was being obstructive on this article!). :) Miyagawa (talk) 20:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Town Called Mercy.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:A Town Called Mercy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * This was shown as orphaned by a wikilink fault which I corrected. I did change the licence though. REVUpminster (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Celebrity Juice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Who
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Who you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- 15:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

versions of the doctor
Give me a buzz when you're done getting improved images in place for that, as then I'll delete the past revisions (don't want to do it now in case you make a mistake on your end). --M ASEM (t) 15:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elisabeth Sladen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elisabeth Sladen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 05:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elisabeth Sladen
The article Elisabeth Sladen you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Elisabeth Sladen for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 08:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Peer review of Elisabeth Sladen
Hi, re : see WP:PR where adding is just step 1 of 5. -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Doctor Who GA
Apologies, Kelvin. I recently started and then lost a job, so I was a bit preoccupied. I'll try to start on it tomorrow. Rusted AutoParts 18:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Doctor Who article
Hi, in response to my comment at Talk:Doctor Who/GA2, I've made a rough outline at User:Glimmer721/sandbox/Doctor Who outline. I'd really like to help although I may not have all the sources (books are extremely valuable in this case as are DVDs which I do have a few of) but we could start and then bring attention to the rest of the project. Doing one section and starting with the easier ones at a time would be a good way to start. What do you think? Glimmer721 talk  17:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes and I've also found that other articles have references that we can borrow. The BBC Classic Who page actually borrows a lot from The Television Companion and The Discontinuity Guide. I've got some recent DWM issues which at the very least have a good article about bringing the series back (and how spin-off media was affected), and I should be able to cover the 2010s easily. Essentially going through Template:Doctor Who and finding a way to incorporate everything briefly while remaining out-of-universe and proving why each thing is notable is the goal. It's kind of difficult to find how to arrange everything though!

Your GA nomination of Doctor Who
The article Doctor Who you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Doctor Who for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- 10:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579744862 your edit] to An Adventure in Space and Time may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * BOparam::WScontent::loadArticle::context_id=B46A229B-3FD2-4153-9FC8-76CD4D0BEBD5|publisher= [British Film Institute]|accessdate=1 November 2013}}

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582427313 your edit] to 12 Again may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Hartnell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Bradley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

File:John Hurt as The Doctor.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Hurt as The Doctor.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. M ASEM (t) 22:10, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rose (Doctor Who)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rose (Doctor Who) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilkTork -- 19:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rose (Doctor Who)
The article Rose (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Rose (Doctor Who) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilkTork -- 22:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 12 Again (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Simon King, Chris Johnson, Louis Smith, Dave Myers and Dan Starkey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man 2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ip Man 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- 15:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man 2
The article Ip Man 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ip Man 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- 18:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ip Man 2
The article Ip Man 2 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ip Man 2 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- 19:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rose (Doctor Who)
The article Rose (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rose (Doctor Who) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilkTork -- 11:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The White Wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Shadow People (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charmed
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charmed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of New Age Retro Hippie -- 12:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Silence in the Library.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Silence in the Library.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=585137274 your edit] to River Song (Doctor Who) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * | caption    = as portrayed by the series in chronological order  Please note in the series you see the latest first . Left to right from top row: Sydney Wade, [[

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587134544 your edit] to Tommy Knight may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * | Runaways |
 * |  [Doctor Who: Podshock] - Episode 226 Extra Edition {{cite web|title=Doctor Who: Podshock -

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=588542390 your edit] to Judgement Day (The Sarah Jane Adventures) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Judgement Day (The Sarah Jane Adventures)|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ] asked Sarah Jane to write a cover story after the events of Invasion of the Dinosaurs] {{red|&#93;}} was over, Rani and the current version Sarah Jane peer over the Younger Sarah Jane's shoulder and

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=588542465 your edit] to Judgement Day (The Sarah Jane Adventures) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Judgement Day (The Sarah Jane Adventures)|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ] asked Sarah Jane to write a cover story after the events of Invasion of the Dinosaurs] {{red|&#93;}} was over, Rani and the current version Sarah Jane peer over the Younger Sarah Jane's shoulder and

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rigor Mortis (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Chan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The IT Crowd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC store (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Shadow People (audiobook), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)