User talk:Kenam William

December 2018
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the A Christmas Story plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on Talk:A Christmas Story. Thank you. -- MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC).

May 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Obi-Wan Kenobi (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thor: Love and Thunder. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — SirDot (talk) 20:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Obi-Wan Kenobi (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thor: Love and Thunder
I see you keep adding this. In the lead sections of articles on Wikipedia, it is best to avoid parenthesis when possible. In addition, there is an active discussion on the talk page here: Talk:Thor: Love and Thunder. If you have an interest in this summary statement, please join that discussion and weigh in with your feedback. Thank you. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 15:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Stranger Things, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Uricdivine (talk) 22:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Chris Evans (actor). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please note that a film should not be called a box office bomb without providing a source that has described it as such. DonIago (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, regarding your edit here, these details do not appear in the article body. If you were looking at specific reviews, we cannot WP:SYNTHesize individual reviews to personally identify trends across them: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source." We need to use reliable sources that themselves identify the trends. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 20:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Top Gun: Maverick in this edit. The cited reliable source does not draw this conclusion. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, please begin a new discussion on the article's talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You tried something similar before in this edit. Please stop disrupting the page. It is time to discuss your position. --GoneIn60 (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Reception in MCU leads
Please, stop adding praised aspects in MCU episodes' leads, as the elements you're adding are excessive and aren't reflected in each article's respective Critical response sections. —El Millo (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Super Mario Bros. Movie. GoneIn60 (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Despite all the warnings you've received, you continue to disrupt the leads at various film articles, many of which that did not result in additional warnings. Consider this your final warning. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)