User talk:Kendokaponilmm

July 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Timothy Joseph Wood 18:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Fast 8.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  02:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 02:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Amaury. Sro23 (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 02:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)