User talk:Keniaan

Garnet as electrolyte
There are hundreds of pilot research studies on solid electrolytes for batteries, mostly vaguely promising something. It would be useful to describe more realistic achievements, using secondary sources (reviews, books, e.g. Google books). Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Garnet electrolyte
Since I think the garnet article is aimed a lot at physical geography / earth sciences - it would be good to stress the (potential) technological significance of garnets more.

Indeed there are no industrial application examples of a garnet class solid electrolyte. You are right for that part. But regarding the scope of wikipedia (everything based on secondary sources) REVIEWS can be included (which was the case indeed). I never added something on wikipedia before, but it would be a pitty if only examples of industry (or any other practical application) would be used, disregarding the theoretical part (or in other words: potential a material/subject has). In my opinion, the purpose of an encyplopedia should be broader(and in many cases, Wikipedia is able to do so). Keniaan (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)