User talk:Kenloebel

June 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Gamaliel ( talk ) 12:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Bias from wiki
I have forwarded your reply to news media, FBI, and international media to show your bias. [redacted per BLP] and that is part of her biography. Kenloebel (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked users
Wiki blocked me for political censoring reasons, which in this day and age, is not only scary to the population, but it is a sign of the times. Censorship on Facebook, Google, Twitter, Wiki all point to a single-minded viewpoint unwilling to examine truth and unwilling to allow perspective Kenloebel (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Blocking facts hurts the world and creates false information being pushed. Thus it censors legitimate discussion while suppressing facts. Kenloebel (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Political Censoring
America is becoming a nation of technology censors and human rights violators, using censorship and shaming as a means to hide from truth, fear differences of opinion, and an attempt to create a false reality in a tech- version of the world.

By censoring views, Wiki is now in the realm of totalitarian rulers that abuse people's rights, indoctrinate mass population with falsehood and steer opinion from truth to artificial indoctrination with intentional avoidance of perspective and tolerance. Wiki is now a tool of the intolerant world seeking control and extension of bigotry, hate, censorship, and Violations of human rights and dignity. Kenloebel (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Who controls Wiki?
What political ideology is determining to censor speech at wiki?

It is an Unamerican policy and a violation of human rights to suppress speech, and when people are simply using Wiki as a public relations tool, putting incomplete and misleading information on, suppressing additional factual information, the it has no credibility as anything more than a biased public relations and censorship tool. Kenloebel (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)