User talk:KennedyResearch

We had the chance to talk to the Program Manager, Mel Barney, regarding ties between Jack Ruby and the Central Intelligence Agency. It was not possible for Ruby, whom Mr. Barney personally knew, to have been on the test flight, without having a Top Secret clearance from the CIA or FBI. The FBI tact does not hold water: Why would the FBI interested in an aircraft capable of covert insertion  / attack? They would not, but the CIA clearly did. The interesting part is the logs which are still available make it very clear that Jack Ruby was involved beyond what has been previously disclosed.

KennedyResearch (talk) 03:18, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * That means that you cannot, for instance, cite your own book for material on Wikipedia. Please review WP:V, WP:RS and WP:COI, and while you're acquainting yourself with Wikipedia policy, please read the policy on edit-warring, which is what you're heading into, counting your edits as an IP.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jack Ruby shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jim1138 (talk) 04:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I've reverted your latest addition, as it presents original research unconfirmed by other sources: please remember that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and that Wikipedia is not a place to reveal great truths or to promote your own books. If you add this again it will be brought up at the edit-warring noticeboard.  Please use the article talkpage to discuss your proposed additions. Please also read WP:SYNTH.   Acroterion   (talk)   14:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)