User talk:KennyCombat 2020

Welcome KennyCombat 2020! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, KennyCombat 2020. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Hi KennyCombat 2020, I also suggest reading Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films. S0091 (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Lyosacks Movie


Hello, KennyCombat 2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Lyosacks Movie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Lyosacks Movie II
Hello, KennyCombat 2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Lyosacks Movie II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Lyosacks Movie II


Hello, KennyCombat 2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Lyosacks Movie II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

The Lyosacks Movie moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Lyosacks Movie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WhoAteMyButter ( 📨talk │ 📝contribs ) 05:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I see that you have re-created the article, still without references to establish notability. In its present form the page is likely to be deleted as an article, so you would be much better advised to work on the draft until it's ready. JBW (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Lyosacks Movie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lyosacks Movie, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/The Lyosacks Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Art of Justice: Eye of the Tiger moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Art of Justice: Eye of the Tiger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Art of Justice: Eye of the Tiger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Art of Justice: Eye of the Tiger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Art of Justice: Eye of the Tiger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * The articles you have written are completely unsourced. As you're moving them back, when they are moved to draft, I'm taking this to AFD. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick and Ellis: The Movie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick and Ellis: The Movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick and Ellis: The Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You've been blocked for several reasons. You've created pages on several films that are at best, non-notable movies that were likely created by yourself, given your username. At worst they were pages that also had material that was a blatant hoax. You also inserted said hoaxes into other articles, making it necessary for others to clean up after you. You'd also been warned about moving these live when they were placed at WP:AfC, something that was honestly a bit of a mercy, but you moved them back live despite getting a warning that they would be promptly nominated for AfC. I can't see where you've really made any beneficial edits at all, as the only non-hoax or self-promotional edit you made was to alter the poster on the Free Guy article. It's an edit that, while not malicious in intent, was decidedly unhelpful. It's because of this that I indefinitely blocked you. Wikipedia is not a place to write about things you created one day. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The user has since contacted me twice via email, each time saying that they didn't do anything wrong. KennyCombat_2020, discussion about any unblock must take place here on Wikipedia. However that said, you seem firm on your statement that you didn't do anything wrong, so unblock is going to be fairly unlikely with that mindset. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've changed the block so that you cannot continue to send petitions for an unblock via email. Unblock requests must be posted on Wikipedia for transparency's sake.

UTRS 54292
is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)