User talk:KennyOkg/Digital divide in education/Umiuottawa Peer Review

Hello KennyOkg,

You chose an important topic for your article. Digital divides is an issue that has always affected education and with the start of the pandemic its impact has increased. I strongly believe that you addressed an important topic in your article.

Peer review

Lead

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The new lead has been created to itroduce the article. The lead concisely describes the information that follows. In the lead the author gives a brief introduction to the upcoming sections like economic, geographic, and application challenges. Content

Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content is relevant to the topic. Is the content added up-to-date? The references and information are current. The article talks about digital divides in pre and post Covid era. Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? The topic addresses an important equity issue in education. It gives a concise introduction on the reasons and solutions to  a non-specialist audience. Tone and Balance

Is the content added neutral? The content is neutral and based on reliable sources. Sources and References:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The content of the article is based on findings of scientific research and articles. The article in the reference are peer-reviewed, Are the sources current? The sources are published between 2015-2021. They are current and relevant to the content. Check a few links. Do they work? DOI links for references number 4 and 5 do not work. However, it is possible to find the texts by searching them on web. Organization

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The article is organized into multiple paragraphs that focus on various aspects of digital divides. The article is free from grammatical and spelling errors. It is visually and textually clear. Images and Media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The article has two images and one video link. The images adhere to Wikipedia’s copyright regulations. For accessibility purposes, a caption that describes the picture in detail would be beneficial. For New Articles Only

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? This is a new article which discusses a very important topic of digital divides in education. It is linked to multiple other articles to increase its discoverability. However while I was reviewing it, I came across an existing Wikipedia article on Digital Divides. I think that this article could be added as a chapter to the already existing one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide Overall impressions

I greatly enjoyed the article and congratulate the author on addressing this important topic. The organization of the text is clear, it includes images and video links to increase the comprehension. Text is neutral in tone and addressed to non-specialist audience. A couple of suggestions that I have are: considering a possibility of adding this content to the existing Wikipedia article on Digital Divides; and adding captions to the images for accessibility purposes.