User talk:Kenobi5487

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing 2011 UAAP Women's Volleyball, Kenobi5487.

Unfortunately Vvvaggot has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"?"

To reply, leave a comment on Vvvaggot's talk page.

New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Outing
You may wish to see [] this has been dealt with and your post is pretty close to identical. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

International reactions AFDs
Thanks for fighting against all these articles, I've been wanting to get rid of them for years. Unfortunately it seems that a notability argument isn't a great one since people can say "But sources! GNG!", especially because it's not the topic of international reactions in general that is so problematic, but listing all the individual governments' statements that are repetitive and unnecessary. From the talk page of the main Paris article it seemed there was a good consensus against including the statements, but they're inevitably added and must be spun off. It's so much harder to delete an article once it's made than the same content on another page! Let me know later and I'd definitely help with trying to go down the road of selective merging afterward. Reywas92 Talk 23:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

You should at the very least withdraw Articles for deletion/Reactions to the September 11 attacks. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Notability
Hello Kenobi, you were involved in an AfD whose result presumed notability for all railway stations, just as we previously did for schools. You might be interested in this one: Articles for deletion/Hapa Road railway station. There are currently 2,800 articles written about the 8,500 India railway stations. Two thousand of those are stubs and several hundred are single-source sub-stubs. The inclusionists point to Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations) as policy that mandates notability, but I don't read it that way. Rhadow (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kerakat railway station
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kerakat railway station. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.  Qcne  (talk)  10:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)