User talk:KentRSmith

Welcome!
Hello, KentRSmith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. McSly (talk) 01:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aerotoxic syndrome. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I've made several constructive edits to the "nocebo" section of the page and they keep getting deleted. Someone is trying very hard to keep that false and misleading term associated with bleed air contamination. There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that nocebo effect has anyhing to do with bleed air contamination. No studies. No evidence. No facts. Fact is, the "nocebo effect" in itself is a dubious and unsubstantiated term.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AussieWikiDan (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aerotoxic syndrome. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. AussieWikiDan (talk) 10:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Nocebo Effect Unsubstantiated
That section needs to be deleted or extensively revised. There is absolutely no evidence, studies, or research to show that "Nocebo Effect" has anything to do with bleed air contamination. KentRSmith (talk) 06:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Fix the unsubstantiated claim that "nocebo effect" is responsible for contaminated bleed air and there won't be an issue. KentRSmith (talk) 06:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Aerotoxic syndrome) for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)