User talk:Kenyon2005

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Kenyon2005, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Farnborough Hall seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – robertsky (talk) 10:29, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I have also moved the following page that you have created, Template:Holbech Family of Farnborough Hall to your userspace/sandbox User:Kenyon2005/sandbox/Holbech Family of Farnborough Hall, as that content is not appropriate to be in that namespace and for yourself to work on further if you choose. – robertsky (talk) 10:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you!Kenyon2005 (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Farnborough Hall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 06:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The owner information is incorrect. Please delete references to ownership without citation. Thank youKenyon2005 (talk) 06:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Charles, Prince of Wales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Will follow up with dispute resolution. Kenyon2005 (talk) 16:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Farnborough Hall, you may be blocked from editing. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 19:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Farnborough Hall shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Farnborough Hall. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * They already had a final warning (by me), but they removed it. Liliana (UwU / nya) 20:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Happy Editing ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 20:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)