User talk:Kenyonhero


 * }

Slow down please
You seem to be making a lot of edits very quickly, but you might want to slow down and think a little bit before you do more. In this edit, for instance, you added an item that was already mentioned in the very same sentence. Favonian (talk) 17:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. AussieLegend (talk) 17:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ant farm episode list


The article Ant farm episode list has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CRYSTAL No indication of WP:notability. Reference does not mention show. Only entry is a pilot with no further information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ant farm episode list for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ant farm episode list is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ant farm episode list until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Mario video games by year. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Suite Life on Air


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Suite Life on Air, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AussieLegend (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Suite Life on Air. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Disney Channel crossovers with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  — Mr. Stradivarius  ♫ 18:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Rihanna discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''See WP:CRYSTAL. All material, especially regarding future events, must be referenced by citation to verifiable information from reliable sources.'' Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 07:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continued addition of information without reliable sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nyttend (talk) 12:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Note at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes
Your most recent edits at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes added unsourced content despite a note (which you deleted) that read, "Please be sure to read the following: Do not add summaries for future episodes unless the episode summary is directly supported by the citation in the "RTitle" field of this episode entry, or a citation from a reliable source is provided. Unsourced content will be removed." I was just wondering, was this note too hard to understand? What exactly caused you to add content that isn't supported by the existing citation and why did you not provide a citation for the content? Why did you ignore the edit summaries from the edits immediately prior to yours, especially this one which says to check the talk page and not restore the unsourced content. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Rihanna discography, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

final warning for unsourced edits and rumors
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britney Spears discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 07:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Ghost Hunters
New season announcements should go on the main article page for the show [here]. The episode list still has to finish Season 7 before you clutter it up with future season that haven't even begun yet. And Ghost Hunters IS NOT the longest running reality show, Survivor I believe has that honor and has ran 27 seasons already. GH is the longest running reality series on Syfy, so get facts straight before you post them. Also you need to reference your claims or they will be deleted. Cyberia23 (talk) 20:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celebriteens


The article Celebriteens has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication  of importance. Unreferenced and no  sources found. See WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Celebriteens, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Disney theatrical feature films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  McDoob AU  93  14:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Girls Up


A tag has been placed on Girls Up requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Monty 845  15:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Block
You obviously have no intent on editing constructively or reading any policies on article creation or inserting rumors/speculation into articles. Despite warnings and a previous block, you've continued to create articles that fail notibility guidelines and contain no sources and violate WP:CRYSTAL. Unless you can demonstrate that you've read and understand how to constructively contribute to the encyclopedia, you will remain blocked. - eo (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, ignoring warnings and talk page communication. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.