User talk:Kepmason

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nonsense ferret  21:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Response to your query on my talkpage
There are a number of issues which probably merit mention here in more detail:


 * 1) As you may be a representative for the company, please be aware of the guidance in WP:COI, which points out, for a number of good reasons, that those with a conflict are strongly discouraged from editing articles on subjects with which they are conflicted.
 * 2) There are, as you rightly point out, quite a large number of poorly referenced articles on wikipedia, and which are written in the form of PR advertisements rather than a genuine encyclopedia entry for a notable company. Many of these articles have not even gone through the independent review process. I'm sure you'll understand that this in itself isn't a good reason for us to officially accept more of them.  The volunteer editors are doing their best to find, identify and delete such articles, but as you can imagine there are quite a large number of companies in the world with marketing representatives busily trying to promote their brand.
 * 3) As noted in the review notes WP:CORP is the guideline of notability which companies have to evidence to show sufficient notability for an entry in this encyclopedia. The sort of multiple examples of significant coverage in reliable sources exclude such things as press release/press pack coverage in the business press, but would include such things as detailed independent discussion of the companies contribution to the industry in a broadsheet national newspaper.
 * 4) Leaving aside the issue of referencing and notability, your article does not prima facie present a strong case for why this company of 35 employees is more notable to the general reader than any other similar software development company. In particular the proud discussion of major clients brings to mind the style of an advert, which isn't really relevant to the companies notability.

I hope these comments make sense, and provide some extra clarification regarding my review. --nonsense ferret  13:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As an additional aside, I have looked carefully at the Opti-time example you provided, and it has been tagged as not notable for a year, and since I cannot find significant coverage, I have now nominated that article for deletion. --nonsense ferret  13:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wheatley Associates concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wheatley Associates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wheatley Associates


Hello Kepmason. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Wheatley Associates".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)