User talk:Kepstrum

This account user is a paid contributor on behalf of Kepstum Inc.
Kepstrum (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The above notice is meant for article talk pages, not user pages. I have taken the liberty of placing the proper notice on your user page for you. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 19:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kepstrum/sandbox


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Kepstrum/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Silikonz 💬 21:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Request to unblock
Kepstrum (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Only one unblock request at a time, please. Your request will be considered when an admin has time to review it.

Please be aware that a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics on Wikipedia must be notable to deserve inclusion. In the case of a company, the notability criteria for companies and organizations must be met. This means that the company must have already received significant coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources.

We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. Company-authored sources cannot establish its notability - only third-party coverage can do that. As well, it is an inherent conflict of interest to write about your employer. Even if your company is proven to be notable enough for inclusion, the subject of an article has no right of ownership or control over its contents. The article will only reflect what reliable third parties have chosen to publish about it, and it will be expressly in a plainly factual and neutral point of view. Please inform your superior(s) that they have put in an awkward position. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)