User talk:Keraunos/Archive 2

List of Crayola crayon colors
Where are you getting #FF00CC from http://www.crayolastore.com/creator.asp for Hot Magenta? It's showing #FF1DCE when I check out the page. PaleAqua (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Both a Hot Magenta and a Purple Pizzaz Crayola crayon are on my desk right now. They are clearly not the same color.  When I write with them on paper, I can again see that the two colors are not the same.  It appears that Crayola has modified the page since my last visit.  Perhaps Crayola has made a mistake?  I know that the values that were on the page before the edit were correct.  I feel bad leaving inaccurate information up on the page, but it looks like that's what's going to have to happen until I take the time to write to Crayola and make them aware of it.  (BTW, I'll duplicate this comment on the List of Crayola crayon colors discussion page.  Crayonsman (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Commented on this at Talk:List of Crayola crayon colors also. PaleAqua (talk) 18:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Please be careful when reorganizing talk pages.
Hi, just wanted to remind you to be careful when you reorganize talk pages. Looks like you accidentally lost some comments at List of colors. PaleAqua (talk) 07:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Western Imperium
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Western Imperium. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Western Imperium. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

discussion about color codes
Sorry, I forgot to notify you about the following discussion: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Color. - Altenmann >t 00:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Your edits to color article
There are several issues with your color edits:

1) You add material about Alice Bailey to many articles, or replace material without giving clear reasons. "Restore complete religion section" is not a reason, it's an observation that a section was removed. A section may be as inappropriate as a single word might be.

2) The Alice Bailey article has five tags: "bias", "synthesis", "lack of significant viewpoints", "unclear citations", and request for complete rewrite. It appears that her theories are controversial, yet you are a significant contributor to that article.

3) Even given that Bailey's theories about color are encyclopedic, there would need to be support that somehow Bailey's color theories are more important or more correct than other color theories. No such evidence is given.

Please consider that your personal interests may not represent a broad encyclopedic concensus. In any event, please do not replace material about a controversial person without discussion. Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you please respond? Otherwise I will remove your inappropriate edits about Bailey from color articles. Piano non troppo (talk) 23:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Color wheel
I appologize that it took so very long, but I finally returned to my talk page and saw your suggested changes to the color wheel image, and updated it: File:RBG_color_wheel.svg. I can't believe I went that long without fixing it. Any other suggestions? - MK (t/c) 08:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Chartreuse
I've reverted a few of your edits to Chartreuse, the ones stating that yellow is the traditional meaning. Take a look at the Talk page. OED gives green as the earliest definition. If you have a better source, please let us know on the talk page before you change it back. Nick (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Aryan Liberation Front
Hi there - much of this article was word-for-word copies of material from the sources cited. Please don't do this: see here.--Mkativerata (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Reform Mormonism
Since you added "Reform Mormonism" to List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement, I felt it only fair to let you know that there is a discussion regarding it's removal going on.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Robotics and robots
Hi

I have been watching your edits over the last two days on robotics articles on my watch list.

I noticed that you have added a lot of entries on various pages for the Golem of Prague. Is it really a robot ? It sounds like a little bit of a stretch as it appears to me it is more a zombie than robot.

Chaosdruid (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Bacon !
Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Bacon has been created, and you are cordially invited to join, and list yourself as a participant at WikiProject_Bacon!
 * You may also feel free to add the userbox - User Bacon - to your userpage, to indicate your participation in the WikiProject.
 * The Bacon WikiCup is also ongoing, more info about that at User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011, and User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011.