User talk:Keraunos/Archive 4

Off white (colors) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Off white (colors). Since you had some involvement with the Off white (colors) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Dean (ufologist) for deletion
The article Robert Dean (ufologist) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert Dean (ufologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Cornflower blue trivia
If you have some sourced items, add them; but a forum is not a source. Don't add a long list of unsupported trivia. Dicklyon (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Same with other colors. You just make a lot of work by adding stuff that needs to be removed. Dicklyon (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I've started a discussion about problems with your contributions at the color project: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Color. Dicklyon (talk) 19:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Photon belt
Both the addition to the 2012 page and the main article need to be heavily cited. Also, I'm fairly sure that the photon belt idea wasn't initially tied to 2012. Given that the 2012 apocalypse meme only really got started in 1975, and the photon belt predates it by decades, it seems that the link to 2012 is a fairly recent phenomenon.  Serendi pod ous  10:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Campus Ambassador needed
Hi! My name is Annie Lin - I'm the Campus Team Coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm contacting you because you're listed as a resident of San Francisco, and we're currently looking for a friendly Wikipedian to teach students in a University of San Francisco class how to use/edit Wikipedia. This is a role titled the "Wikipedia Campus Ambassador," and you'll basically be doing in-class presentations about Wikipedia, running Wikipedia labs/workshops, and in general providing face-to-face Wikipedia help for the professor and the students in the class. The time commitment is about 3-5 hours a week (with variations throughout the semester), and for this particular University of San Francisco class, most of the workload will be between March and May.

Please let me know if you're interested!

Thanks. Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Bodhidharma
People who have blue eyes are Aryan? Its Nazi definition of Aryans.Aryan means 'noble'.Genetically there is so much difference between Germans and Indians.If you check out or search for genetic research results you will find out that most of Indian share same haplogroup.South Asian people do not show that much similarity with outside group.For phenotype to happen [ changing skin from white to brown or body structure]It needs thousands of years even before Bodhidharma.Dont be half educated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.218.163 (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Linking from within quoted material
I've just reverted this well-intentioned pair of edits by you (as well as other edits which are more dubious and not your responsibility). MoS says: "As much as possible, avoid linking from within quotes, which may clutter the quotation, violate the principle of leaving quotations unchanged, and mislead or confuse the reader." -- Hoary (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Adviser/advisor
Hi, Thunderbolt! You have a cool animation there and an interesting user page. We are opposites! Except I like art. Oh, yeah, and I'm smart. ;) Anyway, this is just a friendly note to let you know that there are two accepted spellings for adviser. I'm not reverting your edit at Sumptuary law, but suggesting you may want to save yourself the trouble in the future. I can't find this in the WP:MOSS, so assume we just need to make sure we adhere to one form on any given page.  Regards, Yopienso (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Sanat Kumara page
Hey Keraunos. It's good to see somebody trying to maintain a high standard of accuracy and completeness in articles like the one describing Sanat Kumara. However, as mentioned on that article's talk page, it seems like there is a lot of misplaced and extraneous information that doesn't need to be there, such as the Theosophist views on Shamballa, and the section about the other Ascended Masters. I'm not trying to say that info doesn't belong anywhere on Wikipedia. I'm merely suggesting that it would make more sense to link to relevant and appropriate articles, rather than trying to make every article all-encompassing. I won't try to revert your edits without your direct approval, but please consider this request for pruning. Thanks. Flutterman (talk) 21:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 15:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Jay Neitz
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jay Neitz, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06256/721190-114.stm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090916133521.htm. As a copyright violation, Jay Neitz appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jay Neitz has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jay Neitz and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Jay Neitz with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jay Neitz.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Duoduoduo (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Jay Neitz
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jay Neitz, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Stonewall rebellion
Hi Keraunos!

You added very interesting information!

Would you please provide a complete source (with page reference(s)) for your edits?

The article Stonewall riots has Featured Article status, which is jeopardized by any unreferenced statements.

Thanks!

Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 06:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Shades of chartreuse
Category:Shades of chartreuse, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  17:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Invitation for comment
You recently edited the Mother Goddess article. You're invited to participate in the discussion about the decline of this idea in history. Talk:Mother goddess. USchick (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Lime
I have re-inserted this with a request for a reference; following WP:NOCITE. Since you added a significant part of it, I hope you will consider adding a source. Cheers, 212.10.73.93 (talk) 02:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Timberwolf (color)


The article Timberwolf (color) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Proprietary colour name of a crayon, with no evidence that it has been more generally.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Timberwolf (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timberwolf (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timberwolf (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Polar bear (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polar bear (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Polar bear (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 20:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Arsenic (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arsenic (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arsenic (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mantis (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mantis (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mantis (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

List of ethnolinguistic groups with populations
Hello, Keraunos. Since you created List of ethnolinguistic groups with populations, your input would be welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dolphin (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dolphin (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dolphin (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Iceberg (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iceberg (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Iceberg (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Xanadu (colour) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xanadu (colour) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Xanadu (colour)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Beaver (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beaver (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beaver (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 21:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Regalia (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regalia (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Regalia (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ethnolinguistic groups with populations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ethnolinguistic groups with populations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of ethnolinguistic groups with populations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bear (color) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bear (color) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bear (color) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Color-related merger discussions
Hello! I've seen you commenting on various color-related AfD's and merger discussions, and thought that you might be interested in taking a look at some of the current discussions for mergers and redirects of color articles. The discussions are located at Talk:Redwood (color), Talk:Lion (color), Talk:Camel (color), Talk:Wine (color), Talk:Redwood (color), Talk:Flame (color), Talk:Brandeis blue, Talk:Byzantium (color), Talk:Amethyst (color), and Talk:Robin egg blue.--Slon02 (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that you commented on most if not all of the discussions that I listed. I'd like your input on these colors as well before I propose them for merging, since you're more experienced in this topic than I am. The colors are Cool grey (includes a human culture section that you added, but I'm not sure if that's enough), Charcoal (color), Davy's grey, Pumpkin (color), Persian orange (has a human culture section), and Apricot (color).--Slon02 (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Cool grey can be merged into the "Cool grays" section of Variations of gray. Charcoal (color) can be merged into the "Off-grays" section of Variations of gray. Please hold off on proposing a merge for Davy's grey because that is an achromatic color and I still have to create an "Achromatic gray" section in the Variations of gray article. Pumpkin (color) and Persian orange can be merged into Variations of orange. Just bring along the items in the "human culture" section (and the photo of the pumpkins for the color pumpkin) and put them in the subsection for the color (without a human culture heading) as is done in the Variations of green article. Please do not propose Apricot (color) to be merged because I have a lot of tones of apricot I plan to add to that article. Keraunos (talk) 05:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've created merger discussions for cool grey, charcoal (color), pumpkin (color), and Persian orange.--Slon02 (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm almost finished merging the articles that I named earlier. I see that you have created an "Achromatic gray" section in variations of gray- what would you say to merging Davy's grey into it now?--Slon02 (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Unreliable sources
Perbang.dk is not a reliable source, and it mirrors content of colour articles from en.wikipedia. Please do not add new content based only on perbang.dk entries. bobrayner (talk) 12:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I note that, as well as restoring hitherto unsourced colours by using perbang's copies of en.wikipedia entries (this is circular referencing and is a Bad Thing), a lot of the other unsourced cruft and minimal-quality trivia that I removed has been restored. For instance, this (there are lots of other similar examples). Please stop now. This is an encyclopædia. Please stop adding so many unsourced claims.

More unreliable sources
I note that you removed the unsourced-section tag I applied to Deep Saffron, and you added three sources - none of which mention "Deep Saffron". This really is bizarre. Sources aren't just decoration; they're meant to support the text that you are adding to articles. If you cannot find a source which supports what you want to say, please please please stop adding it to the encyclopædia. bobrayner (talk)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Purple, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rage and Chroma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Spiritual Hierarchy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billion and One trillion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Color-related discussion I would like to hear from you on
See Reliable sources/Noticeboard. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  20:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters
Hi Keraunos,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Keraunos,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The  Helpful  Bot  16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Lunch tomorrow!
Hi, thanks for signing up for the meetup/lunch at the Wikimedia Foundation. Just a reminder that this is happening at noon tomorrow, Saturday the 4th. Our office is located at 149 New Montgomery Street in San Francisco, a short walk from the Montgomery Station BART stop – please see the meetup page for more details. Looking forward to seeing you there! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

List of colors
I see that you have done considerable work at List of colors Please weigh in here concerning the deletion of the current table of contents. Thanks...Modernist (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Color TOC
We now have List TOC, it would be great if you could comment at Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 1. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

List of white nationalist organizations
We've got an IP here trying to use the list to promote a radio station (I note that the IP geolocates to Elmhurst which is in New York City - I suspect a big COI here). I'm going on a Wikibreak today for a while, it would be great if you could help. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 04:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Mysterious sweet potato
Hi! Thanks for your fun and interesting question. Your sweet potato is a sample of Ipomoea batatas 'Ayamurasaki'. First of all, this means that what you ate is an actual sweet potato, and not a purple yam or other sweet potato impersonator. 'Ayamurasaki' is the name of the cultivar. It's a Japanese name because Ayamurasaki originates on Okinawa Island; specifically, in Yomitan and/or Kadena. (I laughed when I saw your question, because I used to live in Yomitan, and I went to grammar school near Kadena.)

"Hawaiian sweet potato" is typically what packers and distributors call the Ayamurasaki cultivar when it's grown in Hawaii.

Although these sweet potatoes are commonly called ben imo (紅芋) in Japanese, that name is just as botanically ambiguous as "purple potato" or "red potato" is in other languages.

I might as well also mention that Ayamurasaki's pith is purple because it contains a lot of anthocyanin&mdash;the same pigment that colours some cabbage leaves, maize/corn kernels, and table grapes. Ayamurasaki is bred specifically for high anthocyanin content. Happily, anthocyanin is an antioxidant. – Ringbang (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * About your follow-up question: After checking some catalogs, I recognize that "Okinawan sweet potato" doesn't necessarily mean the same thing in the West as it does in Japan. Sorry for misinforming you about the cultivar name! It seems that what you bought is actually a variety called 'Purple Heart'. This cultivar is yet another derivative of the "Okinawan" sweet potato. Careful, though, because "Purple Heart" is also an alias for an ornamental sweet potato cultivar called 'Black Heart' (aka "Ace of Spades"), which is grown for its heart-shaped leaves. In addition, another cultivar grown in Hawaii, 'Rapoza', has a purple root pith, but paler skin than the 'Purple Heart' roots you tried. – Ringbang (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Colours and sources again
Hi, I notice that you've been adding more sourced colour-coordinates. In principle, this could be a really positive move; but only if it's a reasonable source. Alas, the lists on i-freeware-download.com appear to have been scraped indiscriminately from elsewhere (including from some crappy made-up content on en.wikipedia which I removed a few months ago) so this is not a good place to start - the last thing we want to do is reintroduce errors thanks to circular sourcing. It's just like the perbank.dk problem which was brought up before. bobrayner (talk) 11:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Vladimir Correa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladimir Correa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vladimir Correa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epbr123 (talk) 14:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm a little troubled by the current state WP:PORNBIO given the suggestions that you made in this AfD. Assuming that the situation vis-a-vis awards is as you put it, I think this means that PORNBIO needs to be altered or annotated (we might say "relaxed") with reference to gay-related awards.  On the other hand, I gather that PORNBIO has just been through a major set of discussions and there will not be any taste for opening the file again, except perhaps among people who don't think gay porn or any porn is a fit topic for Wikipedia… I'm wondering if you have any thoughts about this, and what might be appropriate to do.  Perhaps there might be some way that we could organize a proposal before opening the can of worms by working cooperatively.  (PS: I remember Vladimir Correa with pleasure but I have to say I never felt he was exceptionally notable… sorry to not have agreed with you on this AfD.) Ubelowme (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)