User talk:Keri/Archives

Armley asbestos disaster
Hi. I've nominated Armley asbestos disaster, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Bruce1eetalk 06:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Keristrasza (talk) 21:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Armley asbestos disaster
-- Cirt (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Keristrasza (talk) 21:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Leanne Tiernan
My apologies. I had though the editing was in a lul. --Lucy-marie (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

John Hunyadi pending changes review
You accepted changes in John Hunyadi as part of the pending changes process. I am a reviewer for PC, but I am rarely able to find an article to review. In this particular case, the subject is highly controversial among certain editors, resulting in many changes and sometimes edit warring. My opinion would be that this article is not a good candidate for PC, but I am not sure how to express that to the powers that be. Having done a review for John Hunyadi, what do you think about it?--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Batman rapist
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Samuell Benta
Hi there

You recently reverted changes I made to the article on Samuell Benta (and yes, I know this isn't in my edit history, but I wasn't logged in then and I am now.) I apologise for not stating a reliable source, but I do have a friend who knows Samuell, and he told her that he won't be in the third series. I know that ordinarily this wouldn't count as a reliable source, but the new series does start on Monday, so at that point it will be obvious to viewers that he isn't in it. I knew it was risky putting it on there at this point, but I thought it would be helpful to have the information available a few days early.

But I know that's not in Wikipedia's policies, and if it's such a problem, I'll wait until Monday to change it back.

Thanks for the help George.millman (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the review. Don't forget to list the review, and any other Military History reviews that you might do this month, at WikiProject Military history/Contest/GAN backlog elimination/October 2010.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Okey, will do. Keristrasza (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Possible hospital images for Murder of Suzanne Capper
There are a number of images recently added to the article about Withington Community Hospital that may be applicable to this one. I do not know enough about the premises to know which one reflects its status at the time Capper was treated there, but perhaps this may be of help to you. KimChee (talk) 04:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take a look at them Keristrasza (talk) 11:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Cyberstalking
Hi Keristrasza, I understand you about the section: Anonymous criminal charge, but the another ones? I did changes about types of cyberstalking and legislation. And I think this info is enciclopedic. See you --Internetsinacoso (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, I know wikipedia is not a help page, but i think it could be a good idea put some help links. Maybe put the law enforcements agency of a lot of countries is too much, but give info about how to         inform in an anonymous way about cyberstalking/cyberbullying in social networks, or contact with the ISP, it would be only 6 links. The another option is put each link in each enterprise -link about report abuse in Facebook for example-. People is dying about that, you can see Suicide of Megan Meier, Suicidie of Ryan Halligan, or the last one Suicide of Tyler Clementi. And maybe providing correct and in a fast way info in wikipedia we can help a lot of people. One option is put those links a range of time, to test, and see what another users thinks. Just is my opinion. See you--Internetsinacoso (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikiquette
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --132 20:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review of Murder of Suzanne Capper
I have started the GA review of the nominated article Murder of Suzanne Capper. KimChee (talk) 02:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the pointers in the review; I've addressed them as best I can, although attempting to rewrite it to fit only those references available online would, imho, be too restrictive, taking place as it did before the internet really existed. Keristrasza (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I have posted additional responses, but would like to ask: Did you make this assessment of your own article? KimChee (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * To avoid any appearance of conflict of interest, I submitted the article for reassessment at WP:BIOGRAPHY/A before continuing further with the GA review. This should not take very long; the editors there are good and it will be to the article's benefit to have another pair of unbiased eyes look at it. Also, I would recommend that you resubmit your other self-assessed articles (listed below) as it is implicit with most WP projects that sections for assessment requests exist to have other editors review articles. KimChee (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Corby toxic waste case (self-assessed as B)
 * Murder of Kelly Anne Bates (self-assessed as C)
 * Spodden Valley asbestos controversy (self-assessed as B)