User talk:Kermansh

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 11:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Kurdish people are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Talk pages shouldn't be used to argue about a subject, but to discuss sources, formatting, general issues over how the content should be presented, etc. In particular you need to avoid commenting on other editors. Dougweller (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Scud, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

List of people known as The Great
The list is for "The Great" people, hence references should be for that alone. Yours are more appropriate to Saladin's individual article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Please realise that Wikipedia is built upon consensus. If you feel that a consensus should be built to incorporate edits such as those you have made to this article, please use the article's talk page to seek to build that consensus. So far three editors have expressed the opinion that those edits are not required in this particular article, and have expressed that be reverting your changes. This is a normal thing to happen here, but you seem to be taking t personally (your section below this one).
 * You need to learn the way Wikipedia works. You also need to realise that very few people care about the politics behind the articles. They simply care about the articles themselves. This is not a place where we express a political opinion in our edits or by the way we use our edits. So please take a step back, and simply learn how things work here. Once you understand that you will enjoy contributing far more. It is worth avoiding eediting articles on topic you feel strongly about, and simply enjoying the academic exercise of editing articles well for the sake of it. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

its not your business
if you remove my resourced articles im gone deal with you another way he was a kurdish & its not your damn business

3RR warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Fram (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Spearhead (novel), you may be blocked from editing. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a day for edit warring, as you did at List of people known as The Great. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

WP:Hound
Please read WP:HOUND. You've been hounding an editor, reverting good edits of his for no reason, even removing an AfD template which no one can do except whoever closes the AfD. You'll be blocked if you continue to do this, and if any other Admin wishes to extend your current block I'd endorse that. Dougweller (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Threats, veiled threats and incivility
The edit summary you left with this edit is a hostile edit summary, and is, broadly, threatening. When your block expires you ought, please, to change that behaviour. It breaks or community rules on civility and is potentially disturbing to other editors.

Please consider the way you edit here. You are obviously passionate about the Kurdish People, but your behaviour is not congruent with your acting as an excellent ambassador for them, and is likely to lead to your being excluded from editing this organ for a considerable period. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Kermansh for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Since you appear to have evaded your block, I have just increased it to a week. Please, sit it out. Further attempts at evasion will only result in your block being extended even further. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Once your block expires you are truly welcome here
Please put this behind you. I understand the very real sense of injustice you feel over the issues with the Kurdish People and the history of oppression. I hope you see that this is not reflected here, but that this is simply about the way you have behaved. Let's put that in the past.

We create an encyclopaedia here. It is as neutral as possible in tone, and does not take part is politics, however tempting, and however necessary t can feel to do so. All we are interested in is in creating well written, neutral articles about notable and verifiable topics. Your fellow Kurds are a notable people and their achievements and their persecution are each notable. If you feel you need to add to articles on your heritage, please do so, and do so well, and with cited sources.

Equally, please be aware that Wikipedia is a co-operative effort by many editors, most of whom have opinions, some of whose opinions will differ from yours. Working with these people is a skill that is difficult to achieve well, and makes it fun when you learn the way of doing it. Being an editor here is like solving puzzles all the time. It's more complicated than simply writing an article that pleases you. INstead it must please "us", whoever we are.

I'm sorry you've had a difficult first experience. Please use it as a place to start and enjoy being a part of the crew here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Kermansh for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Again? Please step away from the keyboard and this article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * See ]]Sockpuppet investigations/Kiaxar/Archive. This sockpuppet and puppetmaster are now both blocked. Dougweller (talk) 10:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)