User talk:Keronica Grant/sandbox

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Joselv83 (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

=Peer Feedback=

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Keronica Grant Keronica_Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 2/13/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): too long

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: multiple sentences, correct grammar and punctuation

Other comments:

--Christina geo (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review-	5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**-	Keronica Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage-	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keronica_Grant/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page-	5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor-	5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)-	Too long

Image (needed/appropriate)-	n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-	Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed-	Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-	Yes

Wikiformatting-	Good

Grammar & composition-	Good

Other comments-	None

DJames5 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Date of review	 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Keronica_Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor	 05/06/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short)	 Appropriate length of edit Image (needed/appropriate)	 None applicable for this edit Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	 Accurate information provided directly from text the text book Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	 N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	 Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting	Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition	Grammar and spelling were error free Other comments	Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)