User talk:Kerry M. Chase

Welcome!


Hello, Kerry M. Chase, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Jim1138 (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Carbon dioxide
I don't see your citation as being a wp:reliable source. It appears contrary to the vast majority of climate scientists views. Please discuss this on talk:carbon dioxide before replacing the content. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please leave an wp:edit summary. This helps others understand the intent and reasoning behind edits. Your edit on dysthimia is an example. It was undone as someone apparently could not make sense of it. Edit summaries also help others find edits in the wp:page history.
 * If you would like some assistance, please consider using the wp:tea house. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Edit War warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Carbon dioxide. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

After being reverted DISCUSS
Before any more editing, please review about what to do when you are reverted. The next step is to DISCUSS at the article talk page, where we have certain guidelines to follow. If you are unhappy with the discussion, don't keep restoring the reverted text or variations of it. Instead, rely on dispute resolution NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)