User talk:Kerry Raymond/Archive 13

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Petroleum infrastructure in Australia


A tag has been placed on Category:Petroleum infrastructure in Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Doesn't Australia have oases?
I noticed that you removed a number of oases categories from Australian articles. There are at least half a dozen oases within the Australian desert(s), which fulfill the same criteria as those in the Sahara, Arabian and Gobi deserts. An oases is a pool or spring in a remote dry area, which is usually fed by underground springs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.74.2 (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It would help if you could show me a diff as I don't recollect doing this. I've mostly been updating 2016 census infomation lately. Kerry (talk) 22:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Boyce Gardens upload photos
Hi Kerry Raymond,

I am relatively new to Wikipedia so please excuse me if I am doing things wrong. I saw your message thanking me for uploading photos to Boyce Gardens. You're welcome. I have more photos of the garden but don't want to overdo it. Please advise if you think I should add more or is that sufficient?

Very pleased to see this wonderful garden on Wikipedia. I am related to the Boyces and spent many great times there. Walterswithin (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kerry, Thanks for your informative reply. Yes, the Boyce swimming pool did get filled in for health and safety reasons. I've changed the caption as you suggested.

The University of Queensland web site has a lot of information about the Boyce gardens and the Boyces themselves. I am not sure if any of this can be brought over to Wikipedia, or does that constitute a breach of copyright?

I added a photo to the Mount Lofty article, but it's not positioned very well. See what you think. Walterswithin (talk) 12:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

local knowledge
Hi Kerry. I created Harlin Solar Farm because it was listed as "Under construction" at List of solar farms in Queensland and large. However as I sought references for the article, it seems to be more of a lawyer's dream than an actual construction site. Do you know whether it has really started construction (beyond a photo op with an MP) or is ever likely to? Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 03:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I can't shed any more light on the project. I've never heard of it myself but it's definitely listed as "proposed project" using this map from which you can get a download of of a CSV of all usch projects (which might be useful source material for your list). Using the Qld Globe, the land use for that site is listed as "grazing on native vegetation" which is clearly the use of the land that you can see in Google Street View (I think the tree surrounded by sheep is the tree in the photo op but taken at a slightly different angle). But what's there right now on the site is hard to know without driving past and looking. It appears to be a Chinese project so maybe financing has been impacted by China-USA trade war. Kerry (talk) 04:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thanks for your message on my talk page (and feel free to reply here). Do you have particular examples (other than my page move yesterday which was accidental) in mind? - I'm keen to make sure my edits are not seen as vandalism! Bookscale (talk) 10:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, a few of the page moves I have done are marked as minor edits. I don't know why - is it set by default? Bookscale (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Growth team updates #12
Welcome to the twelfth newsletter from the Growth team!

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

General news

 * A training for mentors has been published. The training was first tried with the Czech community, and went well.
 * Growth team features have been deployed to Hungarian, Ukrainian, and Armenian Wikipedias. If your community is enthusiastic about welcoming newcomers, we encourage you to contact us so that we can verify together whether your wiki is eligible. Then you can go through the checklist to start the process of configuring the features.

Productive edits from newcomer tasks
We deployed the basic workflow for newcomer tasks to our target wikis on November 20, and the early results are exciting.




 * About 1.5% of newcomers who visit their homepage complete the workflow and save a suggested edit. So far, this has amounted to over 450 edits, on all wikis, coming from both desktop and mobile users.
 * When we look at the edits that newcomers make, we see that they are largely positive! We are pleased to see that this feature does not appear to encourage vandals.
 * 75% of the edits are productive and unreverted.
 * 95% of the edits appear to be in good faith.
 * Most of the edits include copyedits and adding links, with some newcomers also adding content and references. Copyedits are suggested most strongly.
 * Click here to learn more specifics about the results so far.

Topic matching deployed
The results from our user tests showed us that newcomers are likely to do more suggested edits if they can choose articles related to a topic that they're interested in, such as "science", "music", or "sports".


 * On January 21, we deployed topic matching on our pilot wikis. Newcomers are now using it. We expect it to cause more newcomers to try suggested edits, and to keep making more of them.
 * In the coming weeks, we will be making improvements to the accuracy of the algorithm used to topic matching, which is part of the ORES project.

Next steps for newcomer tasks
Because we are seeing positive results from newcomer tasks, the Growth team plans to concentrate our efforts on improving the workflow and encouraging more newcomers to use it.


 * Guidance: next, we will be using the help panel to provide guidance to newcomers as they do suggested edits, and to prompt them to do another edit after completing their first one. In user tests for this feature, demo videos were one of the favorite features, and we will think about how these might be added.
 * Starting the workflow: only about 20% of newcomer who visit their homepage begin the newcomer tasks workflow. We are going to be trying out different layouts of the homepage to encourage more newcomers to try newcomer tasks.
 * Additional task types: we are researching methods to recommend more specific tasks to newcomers, such as specific links to add, or images that could be added to articles from Commons.

'' Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. '' 17:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Aboriginal language copy/pastes
Not sure this is working too well. Although we totally need better coverage of traditional owners and history pre-white settlement, much of these copy/pastes aren't relevant to the actual area concerned, and the focus on "language areas" is a really white-people take on adding information on specific Aboriginal peoples. I feel like it looks a bit silly, say, at Palmer, Queensland, which had significant frontier-war conflict during the Palmer rushes, to have a history section that's mainly a big slab of text focusing on how widely Aboriginal languages spoken in the Palmer area were also spoken in other places. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)


 * 10 copy/pasted paragraphs about different Aboriginal groups in one LGA history section is really getting a bit na-na. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 07:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

CHL
Another thing for when you get around to it (sorry to add another thing to your list!) - I lack the generated entries for the internal territories and the two from overseas, which would be great to have sometime. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)


 * your watch as well, please if possible... thanks... JarrahTree 05:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Imagine a world with a reply button
I thought you might be interested in Talk pages project. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

CAEs
If you've got any insight into the history, etc of the Brisbane CAEs it'd be really useful to have - it's a chapter of higher ed we don't have much about because it's such a bastard to cover due to that three-decade digitisation gap. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Reply
Yeah Kerry, I'll try to take good photos with a crappy camera, but in the meanwhile, I think that I will help Wkipedia/Wikimedia Commons by getting captions for media, and sorting the media. User:WilesHarper —Preceding undated comment added 05:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Brisbane Panorama 1888
Hi Kerry, there is an image online (colourised) of a Brisbane Panorama in 1888 from Southbank looking towards the CBD, I thought this would be a great image to have in the History of Brisbane section but I'm not sure if its allowed to be uploaded or not and I can't find a source other than on Pinterest. Any help here? Thanks--Caltraser55 (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * this one? If so, it's impossible to know what its copyright status is because we don't have any information. Is it a painting from 1888? Is it a painting from 2018 about what Brisbane looked like in 1888? Who is the author, when did they die etc? Was the colouring done at the original time or subsequently and by whom? Etc. I had a look for find this image elsewhere but failed. I can only suggest you contact the uploader on Pintrest and ask them where they found it and what they know of its origins. Kerry (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft article
Hi Kerry, I thought I'd ask you this as you do a lot of work on Queensland articles. Are you a new page reviewer, and if so, would you be able to look at and promote Draft:Vernon Ah Kee please? I didn't create it, but discovered it when I was going to create a page for him a little while ago. I've done a bit of copyediting and it looks good enough to go to me (much better than a lot of existing articles!), but I don't think I'm authorised and am not sure of the process to promote it to mainspace. there are quite a few articles red-linking to him and it would be good to get it up ASAP. Cheers, Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ahh ... I am not sure whether you should have helped with this draft, given it appears to be a university assignment (see the user page for the draft creator). Given your role in this university course, what's your advice on the situation? Kerry (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh... I didn't see anything to indicate that it was an assignment, and I posted a welcome message and other comments on their page back in Feb, but they didn't get back to me, so I returned to it and did some more. Hope I haven't mucked anything up, sorry. Shouldn't there be something on the page somewhere to indicate that it's an assignment? I have sometimes seen posts on talk pages of existing articles indicating this, but there was nothing on this article's talk page. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Generally when we know something is being done in a class situation or an edit-a-thon, most of us back off and give the new users a bit of room to work on the article without assistance/interference. But at the end of the day, this is Wikipedia -- it's not a classroom. You were quite within your rights to do what you did from that perspective and you did it in good faith. I am not criticising you for what you did. But I won't promote it to mainspace but wait for Bidgee to comment on what's the best thing to do now. Obviously a risk of running a university assignment on Wikipedia is the issue of involvement by "regular contributors". And the risk to Wikipedia is that we may end up with crappy work, but, having supported a couple of other university courses in doing student assignments on Wikipedia (but not this particular university's course), I would have to say that the standard of the students' work has always been good (better than the average random Wikipedia contributor), which mirrors your comment about this draft. Don't panic, just wait to see what Bidgee suggests. Kerry (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks Kerry. What I did was mainly fairly minor copyediting; I didn't add content as I was aware it was a newbie's article. I'll leave it in your and Bidgee's hands. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I have emailed User:Carrolquadrio, this is possibly one of her student's from the summer session at USYD. Personally, I think it should be moved into the main space but will allow Carrol to comment. Bidgee (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Bidgee and all.This was a student from our summer school course in which I am senior tutor. This is not one of mine (they would not still be in Draft, ha ha). Of my classes, students did manage to have articles assessed: 7 B class, 5 C class and 15 start within four weeks, so more than half, which was a pleasing result. Thanks for all the help. We understand editors will come in and that is the nature of the Wikipedian community, so we prepare students for that. Sometimes it works in their favour and at other times they have to go back and put some more work in, that's okay too. It is a real learning experience and we use the history pages and other formal assessments to grade. We have now put an 'educational assessment' template on the current work, thanks to  Bidgee for that. Go ahead and move to the mainspace  Laterthanyouthink and thank you all --Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks all for clarifying the status of this draft. I did an AfC acceptance and the student should have received the usual AfC acceptance message. Go wild with it as you will! Kerry (talk) 02:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kerry sorry I meant to include you in that last reply. --Carrolquadrio (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You didn't need to include me as it is my User Talk page so I am automatically notified when you write on it. Kerry (talk)
 * Oh dear, I have been doing this all day, must be time for an Easter break! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrolquadrio (talk • contribs) 03:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks to all for getting that sorted and moved! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Boothtown Aqueduct
I just took those archives off as they aren't needed. Also, why is the archiveurl not showing on the link but on the archived link ? when did that change Dave Rave (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It's pre-emptive archiving. That is the link is still live, but the archive url is added in anticipation of the day when that URL stops working (404 error) or is usurped (redirected to something completely unexpected_. If a reader comes to a citation that doesn't work (whether dead or usurped), the archiveurl is accessible to them. It is much better for the reader. I do pre-emptive archiving all the time. I normally archive a web page when I cite it, so I know that archive snapshot has the page content I used as source material. Usurped URLs are a real problem (as the link appears to be "live" to tools but the content is totally not what was intended by the citation) which misleads automated tools that react to the error 404 response. Simply, pre-emptive archiving (where possible, some sites disallow archiving) protects the information content and verifiability of WIkipedia. It's a bit more work for me but I think it is worth the effort for the longevity and verifiability of the content. Kerry (talk) 23:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * nice idea .. but .. now that I know not a problem, ... but .. for later, perhaps just inlcude the archive datum in a comment area? for when it is needed ... Dave Rave (talk) 06:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Fortune (1805 ship)
Hi Kerry, why did you make the changes to the Lloyd's List citations? Your solution is a bad one. Lloyd's List is a title of a newspaper and should be italicized. The issue number should not be italicized, and it isn't, but it is not part of the newspapers title and so should be separated from it. There are templates that are appropriate, I just don't now them. You are of course welcome to change the citations, but if you do so please do it in a way that doesn't mislead and create new infelicities. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 23:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I wasn't changing the citation, I was simply trying to fix a unstructured citation which had broken syntax and a naked URL (all of which made me think there was little I could do with it that wasn't an improvement!). I looked for a specific template, thinking there might be one but could not find one, so I went with Cite web since a URL was involved. But now you have explained it's a newspaper (I was unsure of whether it was or wasn't), I've made it a cite news, which means the number can now be an issue number. I think that's the best structured template choice until someone find/creates a specific template. Kerry (talk) 02:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Super. Thanks. Acad Ronin (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools
Read this in another language • Subscription list



The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.



The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.


 * On 31 March 2020, the new tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias:  Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian.  If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
 * The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.  The team will test features such as:
 * an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
 * a rich-text visual editing option, and
 * other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved"  section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including the last week dedicated to Australia and Oceania, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius  11:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Maryborough
Hi Kerry, Thanks for helping out with the Sugar section of Maryborough. Just wanted to say that the Pacific Islander Hospital and Cemetery site is an excellent article. If you want to write the sugar section for Maryborough please do. I was just going to utilise some of the Hospital and Cemetery page for it and add some other material I found in a brief couple of paragraphs. Happy editing! Cheers, Jemmy. Dippiljemmy (talk) 02:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I can't really take too much credit for Pacific Islander Hospital and Cemetery site as it was an article I created using CC-BY content from the Queensland Heritage Register, which makes for much less work than researching it all on my own. There is some quite good material at this Qld Govt site on the history of various indigenous communities (which is also CC-BY), some of which has already been added to the relevant articles, some of which has not, if you are looking for source material. There's also a lot of CC-BY content at the State Library of Queensland, this is probably the best entry point. There is also content in NSW heritage database (search using the heritge listing dropdown "NPW Act Indigenous places") which has 100+ entries (all CC-BY). Just remember to include an attribution. For whole articles like Pacific Islander Hospital and Cemetery site, I do it in an attribution subsection. For small quantities of re-used text, I suggest attribution with the citation, e.g. see Cape York Peninsula citation [10] and other similar ones. While these were all done with template (because there were to be a lot of similar ones, you can just do them manually or I can help set up templates if you are planning to re-use a lot of content from a particular CC-BY source. Kerry (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Challenger Battery
I have started making use of your files, see Challenger Battery. Thank you! Calistemon (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * my pleasure. If you know of anyone interested in rolling out articles in other states, please point them in my direction. Kerry (talk) 09:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

"Ask a question" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ask a question. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 01:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #13
Welcome to the thirteenth newsletter from the Growth team!

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

Join the conversation: structured tasks
We are looking for community input on a new project to make it easy for newcomers to make real article edits.

In our previous newsletter, we talked about the productive edits coming from the newcomer tasks feature. Those good results have continued: about 900 newcomers made over 5,000 suggested edits so far. We've learned that newcomers are interested in receiving suggested edits.

Now, we are thinking about how to supply them a feed of easy edits that will help more of them be successful quickly. We have a new idea called "structured tasks". This would aim to break down edits into steps that are easy for newcomers and easy on mobile devices.

In the past, certain kinds of editing tasks have been structured. For instance, adding categories through HotCat. Now, we are thinking about how to structure the editing of articles. The goal is to allow newcomers can make large content additions, especially from their mobile devices.

Please visit the project page and respond to the discussion questions listed on the talk page. You are welcome to show this project to others in your community. You can help by translating the materials to your language so that more voices can join in. We will be having this conversation until June 18.

Expanding to more wikis
We have expanded to six new wikis, and are looking for more interested communities.

In the last two months, we deployed Growth features to six new wikis: Ukrainian, Serbian, Hungarian, Armenian, and Basque Wikipedias, and French Wiktionary. Newcomers from these wikis have already contributed over 600 edits through Growth features.

We want to expand to more wikis in the coming months, and we are looking for interested communities. French Wikipedia already agreed and will be the next one to join the experiment. We will contact several other wikis in the coming weeks to offer them to participate.

Do you think the Growth Team features would be a good addition to your wiki? Please see this translatable summary of Growth features. You can share with your communities and start a discussion. Then, please contact us to begin the process!

Other updates


Work continues on improving newcomer tasks and the homepage.


 * In March, we deployed an upgrade to the topic matching in newcomer tasks. The current version offers 39 different topics using new ORES models.
 * In April, we completed an A/B test of two homepage configurations. We learned that more newcomers will attempt suggested edits if the module is made more prominent. We are implementing those learnings in our next test.  See the full results here.
 * We are currently working on guidance for newcomer tasks. It will use the help panel to guide newcomers through completing easy edits.
 * Our next step is to create new configurations of the homepage. The goal is to encourage more newcomers to begin doing suggested edits.

As usual, we are still welcoming your feedback and questions about our features. Please contact us on the project talk page!

'' Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. '' 14:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Millers Point


A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Millers Point requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

my watchlist all day
shows a very good and positive assertion ! keep up the good work !!! JarrahTree 05:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dargans Deviation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Mountains ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dargans_Deviation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dargans_Deviation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates
Read this in another language • Subscription list



This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.


 * Reply tool : This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon.  The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing  . You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster.  Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
 * New requirements for user signatures : Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable.  Most editors will not be affected.
 * New discussion tool : The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions.   You can see the initial design on the project page.
 * Research on the use of talk pages : The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles.  We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Kleinton, Queensland
Hi Kerry,

When you made your series of edits to this page, you left a sentence fragment in the geography section, which I noticed because it was flagged as a double "the". Since that section doesn't have a citation, I can't figure out the missing phrase that you meant to add. Your edits were last November, but I hope you can remember what you wanted to say and make the correction. Thanks.

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 13:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I'll fix it up. Kerry (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Old Bar, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Old Bar, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Mapoon, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Mapoon, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Lue, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Lue, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Robertson, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Robertson, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Exeter, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Exeter, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bong Bong, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Bong Bong, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bundanoon, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Bundanoon, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cataract, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Cataract, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Brownlow Hill, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Brownlow Hill, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bannaby, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Bannaby, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Dinmore, Queensland has been nominated for deletion
Category:Dinmore, Queensland has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Karrabin, Queensland has been nominated for deletion
Category:Karrabin, Queensland has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Selwyn, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Selwyn, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:South Grafton, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:South Grafton, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:St Albans, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:St Albans, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Manilla, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Manilla, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Eugowra, New South Wales has been nominated for deletion
Category:Eugowra, New South Wales has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #3


Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:


 * The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
 * More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
 * Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
 * The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
 * Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode.  You can enable it in your preferences.
 * On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
 * In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Inverell, New South Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Inverell, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cornish Creek, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Cornish Creek, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tambo, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Tambo, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wyaga has been nominated for merging
Category:Wyaga has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sommariva, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Sommariva, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Somerset, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Somerset, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Richmond, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Richmond, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Barringun, Queensland has been nominated for merging
Category:Barringun, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Shire of Pittsworth has been nominated for merging
Category:Shire of Pittsworth has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)