User talk:Kerryisfrench

Blocked indefinitely. Most likely a sockpuppet of User:Kerryisfrench. Sango 123   (talk)  00:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

I am not a "sock puppet" of kerrysfrench. I have listed evidence for my articles. You shouldn't block me because "I'm most likely a sock puppet. That is completely unjustified statement. You can even check my IP address, I can guarentee you its not the same. So to simply say I am most likely a sock puppet of kerrysfrench and to accuse me of vadalism just because I have edited an article with a new view is completely unjustified. To indefinatley block me just because of one vandalism, which in fact isn't even a vandalism, is wrong. I, at your request, would have stopped posting the article if I had had some speculation that you wanted me to stop. So I asked to be unblocked so that I can start new articles and and edit old ones. I will stop posting the Neo Nazi accuation article.

P.S. The reason that Kerrysfrench and I have almost the same articles is because we got them from the same source. He eveidently did not site his. Also the person who blocked me, Sango123, I noticed on your page that a few of your missions are to combat vandalism and welcome newcomers. Well, I certainly have not vandalized, or at least with out my knowing. As a newcomer you should have given me a warning which you disregarded entirely. I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

P.S.S I would like my request to be unblocked, to be responded to ASAP. Thank You.

-Sincerely  Kerryisfrench

With all due respect, I find it a little difficult to understand your arguments that you are not Kerrysfrench.
 * 1) Your name is similar to Kerrysfrench in that it is simply an expanded contraction.
 * 2) The fact that Kerrysfrench was blocked in mid-January, and with your account showing activity not long afterwards (in the space of several days) shows some evidence (albeit derived evidence) that the two accounts are related.
 * 3) Pretending to be a newcomer isn't likely going to help your cause either
 * 4) You could simply be editing from school/work, and then from home. Two different IPs can still be the same person, easily.

Here's what I have to say: Writing your material on Green Day being neo-nazis is quite controversial in and of itself. The general (visible or invisible, I don't know) rule here is to post it first on the article's talk page, to be debated on by passing editors. If a rough consensus is reached, the the appropriate action (editing or not editing) is taken. By looking at Kerrysfrench's talk page, and looking at your own edits, I see you are a very persistent advocate of that issue. In that case, if you ever become unblocked, you may proceed with writing up a request in the appropriate talk page. Kareeser|Talk! 06:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

First off, I am a newcomer. I know KerrysFrench, he is a friend of mine. Since he told me about wikipedia I thought I would try it out. I used a name similar to his old one because of his mention of his name. Moreover, considering that I have not vandalized I should not be blocked. Also, being a newcomer, I did not know about the posting on the talk page first. Had I known I would of done so. However, I did not know, nor did I recieve any warning or headsup about it. I was simply indefinately blocked. I would like to be unblocked to I can continue posting legitimate artivles that do not involve Green Day. I am sorry for the inconvenience anf if I am unblocked I can promise it will not happen again. Hypothetically speaking, if I were to do that again, you can permantely block my IP address. But, I would like it better if i were given warning of something that I had done, for i might have done it in ignorance.

P.S. I had made a new account and I was blocked just for having it. The name was similar to this one and after reviewing the blocking policies I can understand. However, in the notice i recieved it stated that my IP would be blocked for about an hour or so. That was at 1:30AM January 22, 2006. It is now 4:00AM January 22, 2006, and yet my IP address is still blocked. And just to letKareeser know, I did not post the article on KerrysFrench's talkpage after you took it down from Tre Cool's page. I was not delibertly disobeying. It was done before the warning an di woul have removed it, had I not been blocked.

Sockpuppet?
I came across this page when reviewing the Green Day page. I am user:Kerrysfrench, only, because I too was blocked indefinatly, I am using my IP addres, rather an acount. I'm afraid I can vouch for this user not being me, however It is untrue that we are friends. I have never "met" this person, and was a little surprised to find these outrageous claims posted. Though he is likely a vandal, I can assure you he is no sockpuppet. -user:kerrysfrench
 * Only because of a passing reminder did I return to this page =P I can tell you for a fact that the issue has probably been forgotten already. If you wish to make any requests, you can do so at the administrator's noticeboard. If your claims are true, then I may have been hasty in labelling Kerryisfrench as a sockpuppet of you. However, the case being that they are both vandals, the damage has been done, and while it is an extreme reaction brought on through misinformation, it isn't necessarily an incorrect response either. Both you and the "sockpuppet" engaged in Green day vandalism, and both accounts were dealt with accordingly. Again, if you have any issues to bring up, do so at the administrator's noticeboard, as this page will probably not be checked anymore. Kareeser|Talk! 19:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)